Jonsson P M, Nyström L, Rosenqvist U, Sterky G, Wall S, Ostman J
Swedish Institute for Health Services Development (Spri), Stockholm, Sweden.
Diabet Med. 1996 Dec;13(12):1056-63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199612)13:12<1056::AID-DIA278>3.0.CO;2-E.
All incident cases of diabetes mellitus in the age group 15 to 34 years have been prospectively registered in Sweden since January 1983. To analyse the utilization of outpatient services 8 years after disease onset, we selected the cases registered in 1983 and two controls per case from the general population, matched by age, gender, and county of residence. In 1991, retrospective data about utilization patterns during a 3-month period were collected via a mailed questionnaire, returned by 317 (72%) patients with diabetes and 586 (68%) controls. Seventy-four percent of the cases and 19% of the controls reported at least one visit to a hospital outpatient clinic, including accident and emergency departments. The odds ratio for one visit was 14 (95% CI 9.6-20), for two visits 11 (95% CI 7.0-18), and for three or more visits 8.9 (95% CI 5.6-14). Even when specialized diabetes clinics were excluded from the analysis, the cases had higher odds for visits to internal medicine clinics, to ophthalmology clinics, and to gynaecology clinics, but not for visits to surgical clinics or to accident and emergency departments. Of non-hospital outpatient services, only visits to nurse practitioners were reported by a higher percentage of diabetic responders. Twenty-seven percent of patients with diabetes, as compared to 9% of the controls, had visited both hospital and non-hospital outpatient offices. Females were overrepresented among diabetic high-consumers. The results indicate that most young to middle-aged Swedish persons with diabetes are monitored at hospital outpatient offices, but considerable overlap exists between hospital and non-hospital outpatient services. Further research is needed into the determinants of utilization patterns in diabetes, such as gender.
自1983年1月起,瑞典对15至34岁年龄段的所有糖尿病新发病例进行了前瞻性登记。为分析疾病发病8年后门诊服务的利用情况,我们选取了1983年登记的病例,并从普通人群中为每个病例匹配两名对照,匹配因素包括年龄、性别和居住县。1991年,通过邮寄问卷收集了3个月期间的利用模式回顾性数据,317名(72%)糖尿病患者和586名(68%)对照回复了问卷。74%的病例和19%的对照报告至少去过一次医院门诊,包括急诊室。就诊一次的比值比为14(95%可信区间9.6 - 20),就诊两次的比值比为11(95%可信区间7.0 - 18),就诊三次或更多次的比值比为8.9(95%可信区间5.6 - 14)。即使在分析中排除专门的糖尿病诊所,病例去内科诊所、眼科诊所和妇科诊所就诊的几率更高,但去外科诊所或急诊室就诊的几率并非如此。在非医院门诊服务中,只有去看执业护士的就诊情况在糖尿病患者回复者中的报告比例更高。27%的糖尿病患者去过医院和非医院门诊,而对照中这一比例为9%。女性在糖尿病高消费人群中占比过高。结果表明,大多数瑞典中青年糖尿病患者在医院门诊接受监测,但医院和非医院门诊服务之间存在相当大的重叠。需要进一步研究糖尿病利用模式的决定因素,如性别。