Suppr超能文献

放射治疗与放射治疗联合丙亚胺治疗软组织肉瘤的随机研究最终结果

Radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy and razoxane in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: final results of a randomized study.

作者信息

Rhomberg W, Hassenstein E O, Gefeller D

机构信息

Department of Radiooncology, Landesklinikum, Feldkirch, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Dec 1;36(5):1077-84. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00433-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The effect of the sensitizer razoxane on soft tissue sarcomas (STS) was prospectively evaluated in a randomized, controlled trial. The main purpose of the study was to determine the response rates and local control under the combined treatment compared to irradiation alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1978 and 1988, 144 patients entered the study; 130 were evaluable for response, toxicity, or survival. The patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy with razoxane. They were divided into postoperative cases and patients with gross disease (unresectable primaries, recurrent disease, or metastatic disease). The median radiation dose was 60 Gy postoperatively, and 56-58 Gy in patients with gross disease. The dose difference has palliative reasons. Razoxane was given orally at a daily dose of 150 mg/m2 during the time of the radiotherapy, starting 5 days before the first irradiation. In general, the groups were comparable as to their prognostic factors. There was some imbalance, however, in favor of the postoperative group reveiving radiotherapy alone.

RESULTS

Between the patient groups treated postoperatively in an adjuvant form, there were no substantial differences in local control and survival. Among 82 patients with gross disease, the treatment with radiotherapy and razoxane led to an increased response rate compared to photon irradiation alone (74 vs. 49%). The local control rate was likewise improved (64 vs. 30%;p < 0.05). The acute toxicity was somewhat higher in the sensitizer arm, but there was no difference in the occurrence of late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy combined with razoxane seems to improve the local control in inoperable, residual, or recurrent STS compared to radiotherapy alone. The combined treatment is a fairly well tolerated procedure at low costs. It can be recommended for inoperable primary STS or gross disease after incomplete resection, conditions which are still associated with limited local control and a grave prognosis.

摘要

目的

在一项随机对照试验中对增敏剂丙亚胺治疗软组织肉瘤(STS)的效果进行前瞻性评估。该研究的主要目的是确定联合治疗与单纯放疗相比的缓解率和局部控制情况。

方法和材料

1978年至1988年间,144例患者进入研究;130例可评估缓解情况、毒性或生存率。患者被随机分为单纯接受放疗或放疗联合丙亚胺治疗。他们被分为术后病例和有明显病变的患者(不可切除的原发肿瘤、复发性疾病或转移性疾病)。术后患者的中位放疗剂量为60 Gy,有明显病变的患者为56 - 58 Gy。剂量差异有姑息治疗的原因。在放疗期间,丙亚胺口服给药,每日剂量为150 mg/m²,从第一次放疗前5天开始。总体而言,两组的预后因素具有可比性。然而,存在一些不平衡,即单独接受放疗的术后组有一定优势。

结果

在以辅助形式进行术后治疗的患者组之间,局部控制和生存率没有实质性差异。在82例有明显病变的患者中,与单纯光子放疗相比,放疗联合丙亚胺治疗导致缓解率提高(74%对49%)。局部控制率同样得到改善(64%对30%;p < 0.05)。增敏剂组的急性毒性略高,但晚期并发症的发生率没有差异。

结论

与单纯放疗相比,放疗联合丙亚胺似乎能改善不可切除、残留或复发性STS的局部控制。联合治疗是一种耐受性良好且成本较低的方法。对于不可切除的原发性STS或不完全切除后有明显病变的情况,仍与局部控制有限和预后不良相关,可推荐采用联合治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验