Conion P J, Walshe J J, Heinle S K, Minda S, Krucoff M, Schwab S J
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Dec;7(12):2658-63. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7122658.
This study used a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitor to study the relationship between dialysis room-measured blood pressures (BP) and mean 24-h systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP (SABP and DABP) with left ventricular mass (LV) in a group of 35 stable hemodialysis patients. Predialysis and postdialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure data were collected for the 12 dialysis treatments before the wearing of the ABP device, and the means of these values are reported. All patients were maintained on the same antihypertensive medications for 3 months before the study and had a stable hematocrit value of 30 +/- 3% during this time period. There was no difference detected between daytime and nighttime ABP. SABP was a mean of 4.7 mm Hg below predialysis systolic BP (P = 0.004) and DABP was a mean of 3.7 mm Hg below predialysis diastolic BP. There was a strong correlation between SABP and predialysis systolic BP (r = 0.67, P = 0.0001); however, postdialysis diastolic BP correlated better with DABP than did predialysis diastolic BP. In addition, LV mass correlated with SABP (r = 0.35, P = 0.03) and predialysis systolic BP (r = 0.35, P = 0.03). There was no apparent correlation between either pre- or postdialysis diastolic BP with LV mass. It was concluded that predialysis systolic BP and postdialysis diastolic BP correlates strongly with SABP and DABP. Furthermore, predialysis systolic BP correlates with LV mass in hemodialysis patients. If the deleterious effects of hypertension in this patient population are to be avoided, it is the predialysis systolic BP that needs to be controlled: It is insufficient to be satisfied with good postdialysis BP control, if patients are hypertensive before beginning dialysis.
本研究使用24小时动态血压(ABP)监测仪,对35例稳定的血液透析患者进行研究,以探讨透析室测量的血压(BP)与24小时平均收缩压和舒张压动态血压(SABP和DABP)与左心室质量(LV)之间的关系。在佩戴ABP设备前,收集12次透析治疗的透析前和透析后收缩压和舒张压数据,并报告这些值的平均值。所有患者在研究前3个月均维持相同的抗高血压药物治疗,且在此期间血细胞比容值稳定在30±3%。未检测到日间和夜间ABP之间存在差异。SABP平均比透析前收缩压低4.7 mmHg(P = 0.004),DABP平均比透析前舒张压低3.7 mmHg。SABP与透析前收缩压之间存在强相关性(r = 0.67,P = 0.0001);然而,透析后舒张压与DABP的相关性优于透析前舒张压。此外,LV质量与SABP(r = 0.35,P = 0.03)和透析前收缩压(r = 0.35,P = 0.03)相关。透析前或透析后舒张压与LV质量之间均无明显相关性。研究得出结论,透析前收缩压和透析后舒张压与SABP和DABP密切相关。此外,透析前收缩压与血液透析患者的LV质量相关。如果要避免高血压对该患者群体的有害影响,则需要控制透析前收缩压:如果患者在开始透析前就患有高血压,仅满足于透析后良好的血压控制是不够的。