Lippert C L, Arumugham T, Bhargava V O, Eller M, Weir S J
Marion Merrell Dow Inc., Kansas City, MO 64134-0627, USA.
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1996 Jan;17(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-081X(199601)17:1<43::AID-BDD935>3.0.CO;2-F.
This study was conducted to determine the relative bioavailability of Dilacor XR capsules compared to Cardizem CD capsules at both low (180 mg d-1) and high (540 mg d-1) dose levels. Trough and serial plasma samples were obtained and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the steady state concentration-time profiles. Mean steady state plasma diltiazem concentrations (AUCss(0-24)) of Dilacor XR were 19% and 26% lower than those of Cardizem CD for the 180 mg d-1 and 540 mg d-1 dose levels, respectively. In addition, Dilacor XR had lower mean Cmax,ss, Tmax,ss, Cmin,ss, and trough values than Cardizem CD with percentage differences ranging from 17% to 29%. The variability (%CV) in the data from the Dilacor XR treatments was higher for each calculated pharmacokinetic parameter compared to the Cardizem CD treatments. The %CV for Dilacor XR ranged from 34% to 104% while the %CV for Cardizem CD ranged from 21% to 49%. From these results, it may be concluded that Dilacor XR is not bioequivalent to Cardizem CD at steady state doses of 180 mg d-1 and 540 mg d-1.