Labropoulos N, Volteas N, Leon M, Sowade O, Rulo A, Giannoukas A D, Nicolaides A N
Irvine Laboratory for Cardiovascular Investigation, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, London, England.
Arch Surg. 1997 Jan;132(1):46-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250048011.
To quantify the functional venous outflow obstruction with different location and extent of obstruction attributed to previous deep vein thrombosis.
Case-control study.
Vascular Laboratory, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, England.
Two groups: group 1, 25 case patients and 9 control subjects, and group 2, 45 case patients and 30 control subjects.
Ascending venography, duplex scanning, air plethysmography, and venous pressure measurements in the foot and the arm via a 21-gauge butterfly needle.
Venous outflow fraction (VOF), venous outflow resistance (VOR), and arm-foot pressure differential (A-F PD) at rest and after reactive hyperemia.
Venous outflow resistance was evaluated in group 1. Twenty-two case patients underwent VOF testing, and 16 had A-F PD measurement performed. Case patients in group 2 underwent VOF testing. Signs and symptoms of chronic venous dysfunction were associated with the anatomical extent of obstruction. Limb swelling and ache were present in most of the patients; skin changes were noted in about 30% and ulceration in 10% of patients. The results of all tests showed no evidence of obstruction in control subjects. In most case patients with popliteal vein obstruction, test results were similar to those in control subjects: the more proximal the veins involved, the more severe the obstruction. In 16 case patients, all 3 tests were performed and agreement between A-F PD and VOR test results was found in 14 of them. The VOF test results agreed with the results of A-F PD and VOR tests in 9 case patients. In group 2, 50% of the limbs with obstruction proximal to the popliteal vein had a reduced VOF, which became worst in the limbs with extensive obstruction, particularly when the iliac veins were involved. Of the 73 limbs tested for VOF in both groups, only 7 limbs (9.6%) had their venous outflow markedly reduced by occlusion of the superficial veins.
The anatomical extent of venous obstruction and the development of collateral circulation determine the hemodynamic severity of the chronic venous obstruction. The deep collaterals seem to be more important than the superficial venous system in bypassing the obstruction. The VOR and the A-F PD tests can be used to identify those patients who have venous obstruction, whereas the use of the VOF test may reduce the need for performing the above tests in 50% of the patients.
量化因既往深静脉血栓形成导致的不同部位和程度梗阻的功能性静脉流出道阻塞情况。
病例对照研究。
英国伦敦圣玛丽医院医学院血管实验室。
两组:第1组,25例病例患者和9例对照受试者;第2组,45例病例患者和30例对照受试者。
上行静脉造影、双功扫描、空气容积描记法以及通过21号蝶形针测量足部和手臂的静脉压。
静息时和反应性充血后静脉流出分数(VOF)、静脉流出阻力(VOR)以及手臂-足部压差(A-F PD)。
对第1组患者进行了静脉流出阻力评估。22例病例患者接受了VOF检测,16例进行了A-F PD测量。第2组病例患者接受了VOF检测。慢性静脉功能不全的体征和症状与梗阻的解剖范围相关。大多数患者存在肢体肿胀和疼痛;约30%的患者有皮肤改变,10%的患者有溃疡。所有检测结果显示对照受试者无梗阻迹象。在大多数腘静脉梗阻的病例患者中,检测结果与对照受试者相似:受累静脉越靠近近端,梗阻越严重。16例病例患者进行了所有3项检测,其中14例A-F PD与VOR检测结果一致。9例病例患者的VOF检测结果与A-F PD和VOR检测结果一致。在第2组中,腘静脉近端梗阻的肢体中有50%的VOF降低,在广泛梗阻的肢体中情况更糟,尤其是累及髂静脉时。在两组接受VOF检测的73条肢体中,只有7条肢体(9.6%)因浅静脉闭塞导致静脉流出明显减少。
静脉梗阻的解剖范围和侧支循环的形成决定了慢性静脉梗阻的血流动力学严重程度。在绕过梗阻方面,深静脉侧支似乎比浅静脉系统更重要。VOR和A-F PD检测可用于识别有静脉梗阻的患者,而VOF检测的应用可使50%的患者无需进行上述检测。