Abrams P, Donovan J L, de la Rosette J J, Schäfer W
Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, UK.
Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16(2):79-91.
The International Continence Society Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study (ICS-BPH) was devised in response to the perceived underutilization of urodynamics in the diagnosis of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), together with the apparent reliance on symptoms alone when selecting patients for invasive therapies, despite evidence that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) had poor diagnostic specificity for BPO. The ICS-BPH Study is an international multicenter study employing a wide-ranging patient-completed questionnaire, with questions on symptoms, bothersomeness, quality of life, and sexual function. In addition, each patient underwent multiple urine flow studies and standardized urodynamic investigations (phase I). Phase II was an observational assessment of outcome following a range of treatments: conservative, medical, and surgical. Phase III included data from randomized controlled trials involving a wide range of therapies. One thousand, two hundred and seventy-one patients (mean age, 66 years) were included in phase I from 12 countries: 18% of patients were unobstructed, 22% mildly obstructed, and 60% obstructed on pressure flow studies; 83% of patients performed at least two flow studies. The ICS-BPH Study will allow definitive statements to be made concerning the diagnostic potential of a wide range of LUTS, and will define the place of urine flow studies, describe patients who will need pressure flow studies prior to invasive treatment, and identify those likely to experience an adverse outcome. Although an aim of the study is to produce a diagnostic symptom score, there is considerable doubt as to whether this can be achieved where aging and a variety of lower urinary tract dysfunctions often coexist.
国际尿控协会良性前列腺增生研究(ICS - BPH)的设计初衷是,鉴于在良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)诊断中尿动力学检查未得到充分利用,以及在选择患者进行侵入性治疗时明显仅依赖症状,尽管有证据表明下尿路症状(LUTS)对BPO的诊断特异性较差。ICS - BPH研究是一项国际多中心研究,采用了一份内容广泛的患者自填问卷,涉及症状、困扰程度、生活质量和性功能等问题。此外,每位患者都接受了多次尿流研究和标准化尿动力学检查(第一阶段)。第二阶段是对一系列治疗(保守治疗、药物治疗和手术治疗)后的结果进行观察性评估。第三阶段纳入了涉及多种治疗方法的随机对照试验数据。来自12个国家的1271名患者(平均年龄66岁)被纳入第一阶段:在压力流研究中,18%的患者无梗阻,22%的患者轻度梗阻,60%的患者梗阻;83%的患者至少进行了两次尿流研究。ICS - BPH研究将能够就多种LUTS的诊断潜力做出明确表述,并将确定尿流研究的地位,描述在进行侵入性治疗前需要进行压力流研究的患者,以及识别那些可能出现不良后果的患者。尽管该研究的一个目标是得出一个诊断症状评分,但对于在衰老和多种下尿路功能障碍常并存的情况下能否实现这一目标,存在相当大的疑问。