Dodi C, Pingitore A, Sicari R, Bruno G, Cordovil A, Picano E
Guastalla Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Feb;18(2):242-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015226.
Anti-ischaemic therapy with nitrates and/or calcium channel blockers profoundly affects the results of pharmacological stress echocardiography with coronary vasodilators but the influence on catecholamine stress testing remains unsettled.
The present study aimed to assess the effects of non-beta-blocker antianginal therapy on dobutamine (up to 40 micrograms.kg-1.min-1)-atropine (up to 1 mg) stress. echo-cardiography and to evaluate whether drug-induced changes in the dobutamine atropine stress echocardiography response may predict variations in exercise tolerance.
Twenty six patients with angiographically assessed coronary artery disease (seven patients with single-, 10 with double-, and nine with triple-vessel disease) performed a dobutamine atropine stress echocardiography and an exercise electrocardiography test in random order both off and on antianginal drugs (nitrates and calcium antagonists). In doubtamine-atropine stress echocardiography, we evaluated: dobutamine time (i.e. the time from initiation of the dobutamine infusion to obvious dyssynergy), wall motion score index (in a 16-segment model of the left ventricle, each segment ranging from 1 = normal, to 4 = dyskinetic), and rate-pressure product at peak stress.
Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography positivity occurred in 26 out of 26 patients off and in 23 patients on therapy (100 vs 88%, P = ns). Atropine coadministration was needed to evoke echo positivity in no patient off and in five out of 26 on therapy (0 vs 19% P < 0.01). The achieved rate pressure product during dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was comparable on and off therapy (17 +/- 4 vs 19 +/- 5 x 10(3) mmHg x heart rate. min-1, P = ns). Therapy induced an increase in dobutamine time (on = 16 +/- 3 vs of = 13 +/- 3 min, P < 0.01) and a decrease in peak wall motion score index (on = 1.3 +/- 0.2 vs off = 1.5 +/- 0.3, P < 0.01). The therapy induced changes in exercise time during the exercise electrocardiography test were not significantly correlated to dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography variations in either dobutamine time (r = 0.07, P = ns), or peak rate pressure product (r = 0.24, P = ns), or peak wall motion score index (r = 0.02, P = ns).
(1) non-beta-blocker antianginal therapy only modestly reduces dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography sensitivity, although atropine coadministration is more often required to reach stress echo positivity under therapy; (2) therapy reduces the severity of dobutamine atropine stress echocardiography ischaemia stratified in the time and space domain, but these changes are only poorly correlated to variations in exercise tolerance.
使用硝酸盐类药物和/或钙通道阻滞剂进行抗缺血治疗会显著影响使用冠状动脉血管扩张剂进行的药物负荷超声心动图检查结果,但对儿茶酚胺负荷试验的影响仍不明确。
本研究旨在评估非β受体阻滞剂抗心绞痛治疗对多巴酚丁胺(剂量达40微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)-阿托品(剂量达1毫克)负荷超声心动图检查的影响,并评估多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查反应中药物诱导的变化是否可预测运动耐量的变化。
26例经血管造影评估患有冠状动脉疾病的患者(7例单支血管病变、10例双支血管病变和9例三支血管病变),在停用和使用抗心绞痛药物(硝酸盐类药物和钙拮抗剂)的情况下,随机先后进行多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查和运动心电图检查。在多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查中,我们评估了:多巴酚丁胺时间(即从开始输注多巴酚丁胺至出现明显运动失调的时间)、壁运动评分指数(在左心室16节段模型中,每个节段从1=正常到4=运动障碍)以及负荷峰值时的速率-压力乘积。
26例未接受治疗的患者中有26例多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查呈阳性,接受治疗的患者中有23例呈阳性(100%对88%,P=无显著性差异)。未接受治疗的患者中无一例需要联合使用阿托品来诱发超声心动图阳性,而接受治疗的26例患者中有5例需要联合使用阿托品(0%对19%,P<0.01)。在多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查期间,治疗前后达到的速率-压力乘积相当(17±4对19±5×10³毫米汞柱×心率·分钟⁻¹,P=无显著性差异)。治疗使多巴酚丁胺时间延长(治疗时=16±3分钟,未治疗时=13±3分钟,P<0.01),并使壁运动评分指数峰值降低(治疗时=1.3±0.2,未治疗时=1.5±0.3,P<0.01)。在运动心电图检查期间,治疗引起的运动时间变化与多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查在多巴酚丁胺时间(r=0.07,P=无显著性差异)、速率-压力乘积峰值(r=0.24,P=无显著性差异)或壁运动评分指数峰值(r=0.02,P=无显著性差异)方面的变化均无显著相关性。
(1)非β受体阻滞剂抗心绞痛治疗仅适度降低多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查的敏感性,尽管在治疗期间更常需要联合使用阿托品以达到负荷超声心动图阳性;(2)治疗可降低多巴酚丁胺-阿托品负荷超声心动图检查在时间和空间域分层的缺血严重程度,但这些变化与运动耐量变化的相关性较差。