Pitta J C, Blay S L
Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Feb;95(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb00383.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate the concepts of reactive and hysterical psychoses and how they are classified in standardized diagnostic systems. To this end we identified all of the patients who had been admitted to a psychiatric in-patient unit and diagnosed as suffering from psychogenic psychosis, reactive psychosis, hysterical psychosis or hysteria, using ICD-9 criteria. The case notes of these patients were then re-examined and diagnoses reached using DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria and the Present State Examination (PSE)/CATEGO computer program. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the diagnoses of reactive and hysterical psychosis obtained using ICD-9 criteria with those obtained using the DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, ICD-10 and PSE diagnostic systems. A total of 67 case notes were identified in which the above diagnoses had been made: 27 cases with ICD-9 'hysteria' and 26 cases with 'other reactive and not otherwise specified psychoses'. Using the DSM-III-R criteria, 27 cases were diagnosed as psychotic disorder NOS, 12 as brief reactive psychosis and 11 as bipolar disorder. Using the DSM-IV criteria, 21 cases were diagnosed as psychotic disorder NOS, 11 as mood disorder, 7 as brief disorder without stressor, and 12 as brief disorder with stressor. Using the ICD-10 criteria, 18 cases were diagnosed as unspecified non-organic psychosis, 12 as mood disorder, 10 as acute and transient psychotic disorder without stressor and 13 as acute and transient psychotic disorder with stressor. Using the PSE/CATEGO program, the most common diagnoses were class 'S' schizophrenia (17), class 'P?' uncertain psychosis (16) and class 'M+' mixed and manic affective disorder (11). Using the kappa coefficient a very low level of agreement was found between ICD-9 'hysteria' and 'other reactive and non-specified psychoses' and the corresponding categories of DSM-III-R and the PSE/CATEGO program. We concluded that, although DSM-III-R provides operational criteria for brief reactive psychosis, and DSM-IV and ICD-10 provide such criteria for brief or acute psychotic disorder, these bear little relationship to the original concept of the disorder. The PSE/CATEGO program provides a very systematic approach to symptomatology, but the diagnostic classes have little clinical usefulness.
本研究的目的是调查反应性精神病和癔症性精神病的概念,以及它们在标准化诊断系统中的分类方式。为此,我们识别了所有入住精神病住院部并根据国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)标准被诊断为患有心因性精神病、反应性精神病、癔症性精神病或癔症的患者。然后重新检查这些患者的病历,并使用精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本(DSM - III - R)、第四版(DSM - IV)、国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)标准以及现状检查(PSE)/CATEGO计算机程序得出诊断结果。本研究的目的是评估使用ICD - 9标准得出的反应性和癔症性精神病诊断与使用DSM - III - R、DSM - IV、ICD - 10和PSE诊断系统得出的诊断之间的一致性。总共识别出67份有上述诊断的病历:27例为ICD - 9的“癔症”,26例为“其他反应性及未另作说明的精神病”。使用DSM - III - R标准,27例被诊断为未特定的精神障碍,12例为短暂反应性精神病,11例为双相情感障碍。使用DSM - IV标准,21例被诊断为未特定的精神障碍,11例为心境障碍,7例为无应激源的短暂障碍,12例为有应激源的短暂障碍。使用ICD - 10标准,18例被诊断为未特定的非器质性精神病,12例为心境障碍,10例为无应激源的急性短暂性精神病性障碍,13例为有应激源的急性短暂性精神病性障碍。使用PSE/CATEGO程序,最常见的诊断是“S”类精神分裂症(17例)、“P?”类不确定精神病(16例)和“M +”类混合性及躁狂性情感障碍(11例)。使用kappa系数发现,ICD - 9的“癔症”和“其他反应性及未特定的精神病”与DSM - III - R及PSE/CATEGO程序的相应类别之间一致性水平非常低。我们得出结论,尽管DSM - III - R为短暂反应性精神病提供了操作性标准,DSM - IV和ICD - 10为短暂或急性精神病性障碍提供了此类标准,但这些与该疾病的原始概念几乎没有关系。PSE/CATEGO程序为症状学提供了非常系统的方法,但诊断类别几乎没有临床实用性。