Patience C, Wilkinson D A, Weiss R A
Chester Beatty Laboratories, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Trends Genet. 1997 Mar;13(3):116-20. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01057-3.
Darwin could not have foretold that we are descended from viruses as well as from apes. While there is clear evidence that viral diseases, such as polio and rabies, affected ancient civilizations, viruses were not defined until the early years of this century, shortly after the rediscovery of mendelian genetics. That retroviral genomes can oscillate between infectious and genetic modes of transmission seemed preposterous before the discovery of reverse transcription in 1970. Those of us who had earlier provided mendelian evidence for germ-line transmission of retroviruses were subject of friendly ridicule. Today, the shunting of genetic elements between chromosomes and RNA, and the generation of processed pseudogenes, seems commonplace. It is timely, however, to revisit the topic of human endogenous retroviruses-the subject of this article.
达尔文不可能预见到我们不仅是猿类的后代,也是病毒的后代。虽然有明确证据表明脊髓灰质炎和狂犬病等病毒性疾病曾影响古代文明,但直到本世纪初,在孟德尔遗传学重新被发现后不久,病毒才被定义。在1970年发现逆转录之前,逆转录病毒基因组能在感染性和遗传性传播模式之间摆动似乎是荒谬的。我们中那些早期为逆转录病毒的种系传播提供孟德尔式证据的人曾受到善意的嘲笑。如今,遗传元件在染色体和RNA之间的转移以及加工假基因的产生似乎已司空见惯。然而,现在是重新审视人类内源性逆转录病毒这一本文主题的时候了。