• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)机械通气患者的控制性呼气

Controlled expiration in mechanically-ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

作者信息

Aerts J G, van den Berg B, Bogaard J M

机构信息

Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1997 Mar;10(3):550-6.

PMID:9072983
Abstract

In patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung emptying may be affected by flow limitation. We tested the hypothesis that the airway compression leading to flow limitation can be counteracted by controlling the expiratory flow. The effects of an external resistor on lung emptying were studied in six patients with COPD, who were mechanically ventilated whilst sedated and paralysed. Respiratory mechanics were obtained during ventilatory support with and without the resistor. Airway compression was assessed using the interruptor method. For the study, a turbulent resistor was applied with the highest resistance level that did not increase the end-expiratory lung volume. At this resistance level, external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was generated in all patients. As total PEEP levels remained unchanged at both settings during the controlled expiration, the levels of intrinsic PEEP were significantly decreased from 0.96+/-0.30 to 0.53+/-0.19 kPa (mean+/-SD). Comparison of the expiratory flow-volume curves at both settings revealed that, during the controlled expiration, the flows were significantly decreased during the first 40% of the expired volume and significantly increased during the last 60%. As the end-expiratory lung volumes remained unchanged during both settings, these increments in flow indicated a decrease in effective resistance. Airway compression was observed during unimpeded expirations in all patients using the interruptor method. During the application of the resistor, airway compression was no longer detectable. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving ventilatory support, the application of an external resistor could decrease effective expiratory resistance by counteracting airway compression, without increments in end-expiratory lung volume.

摘要

在重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,肺排空可能受气流受限的影响。我们检验了这样一个假设,即通过控制呼气气流可以抵消导致气流受限的气道压缩。在6例COPD患者中研究了外部阻力器对肺排空的影响,这些患者在镇静和麻痹状态下接受机械通气。在有和没有阻力器的通气支持过程中获取呼吸力学参数。使用阻断法评估气道压缩情况。在本研究中,应用了一个湍流阻力器,其阻力水平最高且不会增加呼气末肺容积。在这个阻力水平下,所有患者均产生了外部呼气末正压(PEEP)。由于在控制呼气过程中两种设置下的总PEEP水平均保持不变,内源性PEEP水平从0.96±0.30 kPa显著降至0.53±0.19 kPa(均值±标准差)。两种设置下呼气流量-容积曲线的比较显示,在控制呼气过程中,呼气量前40%期间流量显著降低,后60%期间流量显著增加。由于两种设置下呼气末肺容积均保持不变,这些流量增加表明有效阻力降低。使用阻断法在所有患者的自由呼气过程中均观察到气道压缩。在应用阻力器期间,气道压缩不再可检测到。在接受通气支持的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,应用外部阻力器可通过抵消气道压缩来降低有效呼气阻力,而不会增加呼气末肺容积。

相似文献

1
Controlled expiration in mechanically-ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)机械通气患者的控制性呼气
Eur Respir J. 1997 Mar;10(3):550-6.
2
Hemodynamic responses to external counterbalancing of auto-positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者呼气末正压自身阳性外部对抗的血流动力学反应
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1782-91.
3
Effect of series of resistance levels on flow limitation in mechanically ventilated COPD patients.一系列阻力水平对机械通气慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者气流受限的影响。
Respir Physiol. 2001 Aug;127(1):39-52. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5687(01)00236-5.
4
Effects of PEEP on respiratory mechanics in patients with COPD on mechanical ventilation.呼气末正压对慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者呼吸力学的影响。
Eur Respir J. 1991 May;4(5):561-7.
5
[Physiopathology of acute respiratory failure in COPD and asthma].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘急性呼吸衰竭的病理生理学]
Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 Apr;67(4):198-205.
6
Pattern of lung emptying and expiratory resistance in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者的肺排空模式及呼气阻力
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1311-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2255-z. Epub 2004 Mar 31.
7
Influence of respiratory efforts on b2-agonist induced bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated COPD patients: a prospective clinical study.呼吸努力对机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者β2受体激动剂诱导的支气管扩张的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Respir Med. 2007 Feb;101(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
8
[Respiratory mechanics of chronic obstructive lung disease in acute respiratory insufficiency].[急性呼吸功能不全时慢性阻塞性肺疾病的呼吸力学]
Rev Mal Respir. 1996;13(2):107-15.
9
[Physiologic response to external positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients].[机械通气慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对外源性呼气末正压的生理反应]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;30(10):756-60.
10
Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during acute ventilatory failure and controlled mechanical ventilation.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在急性通气衰竭和控制机械通气期间呼气末正压的生理效应
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):5-13. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.5.

引用本文的文献

1
A self-regulated expiratory flow device for mechanical ventilation: a bench study.一种用于机械通气的自我调节呼气流量装置:一项实验台研究。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Oct 16;12(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00681-0.
2
Dorsal recruitment with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX): an experimental study in mechanically ventilated lung-healthy and lung-injured pigs.背侧募集与流量控制呼气(FLEX):机械通气健康肺和肺损伤猪的实验研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 29;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2168-9.
3
Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies.
床边波形解读作为识别患者-呼吸机不同步的一种工具。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):34-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2828-5. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
4
Pattern of lung emptying and expiratory resistance in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者的肺排空模式及呼气阻力
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1311-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2255-z. Epub 2004 Mar 31.