Suppr超能文献

通过蛋白质印迹法检测到的抗原特异性抗体反应概况与1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)感染诊断标准的关系。

Profile of antigen-specific antibody response detectable by western blot in relation to diagnostic criteria for human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection.

作者信息

Chattopadhya D, Aggarwal R K, Kumari S

机构信息

AIDS Reference Laboratory, National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Virol. 1996 Oct;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0197(96)00251-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variability in the profile of antigen-reactive bands in Western blot for serodiagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection may result in disagreement regarding interpretation of positive result, due to lack of consensus in the interpretive criteria laid down by various organisations.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were (i) to find out the extent of disagreement over various criteria regarding interpretation of positivity in Western blot and (ii) to review the discordance by retesting the discordant specimens using recombinant antigens as well as by performing repeat Western blot in follow-up specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 467 specimens from high-risk groups, diagnosed positive for HIV type-1 (HIV-1) infection by the criteria of at least one of the five organisations, viz. Association of State and Public Health Laboratories Directors (ASTPHLD), Consortium for Retrovirus Serology (CRSS), American Red Cross (ARC) and World Health Organisation (WHO), were analysed to find out the extent of discordance between various criteria for interpretation of Western blot positivity. The discordant specimens were subjected to line immunoassay (LIA) using recombinant antigens. Also, follow-up Western blots were performed in case of discordant specimens at 6, 12 and 24 weeks intervals.

RESULTS

We observed that criteria laid down by ASTPHLD, CDC and CRSS scored all the specimens as positive while ARC and WHO criteria scored 13 (2.8%) and 18 (3.8%) of specimens, respectively, as negatives which were detected as positives by other criteria (discordant specimens). The gp41 reactive band was the most frequently missing band, being undetectable in 11.6% of specimens while bands reactive to p24, p31, gp120 and gp160 could not be recorded in 1.9%, 9.4% and 3.2% and 1.5.% of specimens, respectively. Testing of the discordant specimens with recombinant antigen preparation and with repeat Western blot in follow-up specimens collected at 6, 12 and 24 weeks demonstrated all bands undetectable in initial Western blot, except 25% of gp41 reactive bands.

CONCLUSIONS

It is felt that before selecting any criterion for Western blot positivity, it should be evaluated in the local population at risk for HIV-1 infection with additional or follow-up tests.

摘要

背景

在用于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染血清学诊断的蛋白质印迹法中,抗原反应条带图谱的变异性可能导致对阳性结果解释存在分歧,这是因为各组织制定的解释标准缺乏共识。

目的

本研究的目的是(i)找出在蛋白质印迹法阳性结果解释的各种标准上存在的分歧程度,以及(ii)通过使用重组抗原对不一致的标本进行重新检测以及对后续标本进行重复蛋白质印迹法来复查不一致情况。

研究设计

总共分析了467份来自高危人群的标本,这些标本根据五个组织(即州和公共卫生实验室主任协会(ASTPHLD)、逆转录病毒血清学联盟(CRSS)、美国红十字会(ARC)和世界卫生组织(WHO))中至少一个组织的标准被诊断为1型HIV(HIV-1)感染阳性,以找出蛋白质印迹法阳性结果解释的各种标准之间的不一致程度。对不一致的标本使用重组抗原进行线性免疫测定(LIA)。此外,对不一致的标本在6周、12周和24周间隔时进行后续蛋白质印迹法检测。

结果

我们观察到,ASTPHLD、疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和CRSS制定的标准将所有标本判定为阳性,而ARC和WHO的标准分别将13份(2.8%)和18份(3.8%)标本判定为阴性,这些标本被其他标准检测为阳性(不一致标本)。gp41反应条带是最常缺失的条带,在11.6%的标本中无法检测到,而对p24、p31、gp120和gp160有反应的条带在1.9%、9.4%、3.2%和1.5%的标本中分别无法记录。用重组抗体制剂对不一致的标本进行检测以及对在6周、12周和24周采集的后续标本进行重复蛋白质印迹法检测显示,除了25%的gp41反应条带外,初始蛋白质印迹法中所有条带均无法检测到。

结论

认为在选择蛋白质印迹法阳性结果的任何标准之前,应在当地有HIV-1感染风险的人群中通过额外检测或后续检测进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验