Broos P, Vanderspeeten K
Department of Surgery, U.Z. Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Acta Chir Belg. 1997 Jan-Feb;97(1):27-32.
The Unreamed Femoral Nail (UFN) has been used in Belgium since April 1995. Compared with the Reamed Femoral Nail (RFN) the new device had some advantages: it can also be used for subtrochanteric fractures and ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck, there is less iatrogenic damage to the vascularization of the bone, the risk of fat embolism syndrome and ARDS is reduced, the operation is a less time consuming procedure, associated with less blood loss. During a 9 months period, 36 patients have been treated with the UFN: 10 patients with metastatic disease, 12 patients with a subtrochanteric fracture, 14 patients with a diaphyseal fracture. In 4 cases however, previous reaming was necessary. No fat embolism syndrome, nor ARDS were ever observed. The two mechanical complications were not due to the implant itself. Two old patients with a subtrochanteric fracture died within six months after the treatment. In the ten others, no healing problems were observed. In twelve patients with a diaphyseal fracture, the evolution was uneventful. In two open fractures delayed union was observed. Once, the UFN had to be replaced by a RFN with adjacent bone grafts. The average blood loss was 140 ml, average operating time 70 minutes. We conclude that the UFN is an easy and safe procedure, which has enlarged the indications of intramedullary nailing also as a primary treatment in polytrauma patients.
自1995年4月起,非扩髓股骨髓内钉(UFN)开始在比利时使用。与扩髓股骨髓内钉(RFN)相比,这种新器械具有一些优势:它还可用于股骨转子下骨折和同侧股骨颈骨折,对骨血运的医源性损伤较小,脂肪栓塞综合征和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的风险降低,手术耗时较短,失血较少。在9个月的时间里,36例患者接受了UFN治疗:10例转移性疾病患者,12例股骨转子下骨折患者,14例骨干骨折患者。然而,有4例患者之前需要进行扩髓。未观察到脂肪栓塞综合征或ARDS。这两种机械并发症并非由植入物本身引起。两名老年股骨转子下骨折患者在治疗后6个月内死亡。其他10例患者未出现愈合问题。12例骨干骨折患者病情进展顺利。2例开放性骨折出现延迟愈合。有一次,UFN不得不被带有相邻骨移植的RFN取代。平均失血量为140毫升,平均手术时间为70分钟。我们得出结论,UFN是一种简单且安全的手术方法,它扩大了髓内钉固定的适应证,也可作为多发伤患者的主要治疗方法。