Coady M A, Rizzo J A, Hammond G L, Mandapati D, Darr U, Kopf G S, Elefteriades J A
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06510, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Mar;113(3):476-91; discussion 489-91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70360-X.
Although many articles have described techniques for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms, limited information on the natural history of this disorder is available to aid in defining criteria for surgical intervention. Data on 230 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms treated at Yale University School of Medicine from 1985 to 1996 were analyzed. This computerized database included 714 imaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, echocardiography). Mean size of the thoracic aorta in these patients at initial presentation was 5.2 cm (range 3.5 to 10 cm). The mean growth rate was 0.12 cm/yr. Overall survivals at 1 and 5 years were 85% and 64%, respectively. Patients having aortic dissection had lower survival (83% 1 year; 46% 5 year) than the cohort without dissection (89% 1 year; 71% 5 year). One hundred thirty-six patients underwent surgery for their thoracic aortic aneurysms. For elective operations, the mortality was 9.0%; for emergency operations, 21.7%. Median size at time of rupture or dissection was 6.0 cm for ascending aneurysms and 7.2 cm for descending aneurysms. The incidence of dissection or rupture increased with aneurysm size. Multivariable regression analysis to isolate risk factors for acute dissection or rupture revealed that size larger than 6.0 cm increased the probability by 32.1 percentage points for ascending aneurysms (p = 0.005). For descending aneurysms, this probability increased by 43.0 percentage points at a size greater than 7.0 cm (p = 0.006). If the median size at the time of dissection or rupture were used as the intervention criterion, half of the patients would suffer a devastating complication before the operation. Accordingly, a criterion lower than the median is appropriate. We recommend 5.5 cm as an acceptable size for elective resection of ascending aortic aneurysms, because resection can be performed with relatively low mortality. For aneurysms of the descending aorta, in which perioperative complications are greater and the median size at the time of complications is larger, we recommend intervention at 6.5 cm.
尽管许多文章都描述了胸主动脉瘤的切除技术,但关于这种疾病自然史的信息有限,难以帮助确定手术干预的标准。对1985年至1996年在耶鲁大学医学院接受治疗的230例胸主动脉瘤患者的数据进行了分析。这个计算机化数据库包括714项影像学研究(磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描、超声心动图)。这些患者初次就诊时胸主动脉的平均大小为5.2厘米(范围为3.5至10厘米)。平均生长速度为0.12厘米/年。1年和5年的总体生存率分别为85%和64%。发生主动脉夹层的患者生存率低于无夹层的队列(1年时为83%;5年时为46%)对无夹层的队列(1年时为89%;5年时为71%)。136例患者接受了胸主动脉瘤手术。择期手术的死亡率为9.0%;急诊手术的死亡率为21.7%。升主动脉瘤破裂或夹层时的中位大小为6.0厘米,降主动脉瘤为7.2厘米。夹层或破裂的发生率随动脉瘤大小增加。多变量回归分析以确定急性夹层或破裂的危险因素,结果显示,升主动脉瘤直径大于6.0厘米时,发生急性夹层或破裂的概率增加32.1个百分点(p = 0.005)。对于降主动脉瘤,直径大于7.0厘米时,发生急性夹层或破裂的概率增加43.0个百分点(p = 0.006)。如果将夹层或破裂时的中位大小用作干预标准,一半的患者在手术前会发生灾难性并发症。因此,采用低于中位大小的标准是合适的。我们建议将5.5厘米作为升主动脉瘤择期切除的可接受大小,因为切除手术的死亡率相对较低。对于降主动脉瘤,围手术期并发症更多,并发症发生时的中位大小更大,我们建议在直径达到6.5厘米时进行干预。