Noriega F G, Wells M A
Department of Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.
Insect Mol Biol. 1993;2(1):21-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00121.x.
The two most common protocols for RNA isolation, Chirgwin et al., 1979, and Chomczynski & Sacchi, 1987, were compared with a protocol using glass powder. The quality of the recovered RNA was tested using agarose gels and Northern hybridization. With the glass powder protocol, we consistently obtained intact RNA, whereas with the other protocols we often obtained degraded RNA. Using specific radioactive probes, we measured ribosomal RNA and trypsin mRNA recovered from fed adult Aedes aegypti females. Our protocol gave a 40- and a 3-fold increase in recovery when compared with the Chirgwin and Chomczynski protocol, respectively. The method using glass powder is simple, fast, reproducible and gives a high yield of intact RNA.
将用于RNA分离的两种最常用方法(Chirgwin等人,1979年;Chomczynski和Sacchi,1987年)与一种使用玻璃粉的方法进行了比较。使用琼脂糖凝胶和Northern杂交对回收的RNA质量进行了测试。采用玻璃粉方法时,我们始终能获得完整的RNA,而采用其他方法时,我们经常得到降解的RNA。使用特异性放射性探针,我们测量了从进食后的成年埃及伊蚊雌性个体中回收的核糖体RNA和胰蛋白酶mRNA。与Chirgwin方法和Chomczynski方法相比,我们的方法回收率分别提高了40倍和3倍。使用玻璃粉的方法简单、快速、可重复,并且能获得高产率的完整RNA。