Suppr超能文献

蛋鸡在不同高度、不同角度间隔的水平栖木上通行的能力。

Ability of laying hens to negotiate horizontal perches at different heights, separated by different angles.

作者信息

Scott G B, Lambe N R, Hitchcock D

机构信息

Poultry Science Department, SAC Auchincruive, Ayr, Scotland.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 1997 Mar;38(1):48-54. doi: 10.1080/00071669708417939.

Abstract
  1. This paper describes how birds move between horizontal perches at different heights with different angles separating them, using the time to complete the task and the number of birds failing to indicate ability. 2. For the first experiment, 4 groups of 15 birds (ISA Brown) were subjected to each of the experimental treatments (using three perches with angles of 0 degree (horizontal control), 30 degrees, 45 degrees or 60 degrees between them). The birds were required to move upward between the perches for each treatment and then to move downward between the perches, as a second part of the experiment. 3. Birds moving up between the perches took significantly longer at 60 degrees than at any other angle. No birds failed to complete the task. 4. For birds moving downward between the perches, the median time to complete the task increased significantly with angle. Furthermore, the number of birds failing to complete the task increased with angle. 5. A second experiment was conducted to test whether the vertical or horizontal component of distance affected birds' ability to negotiate perches separated by different angles. 6. For the second experiment 4 groups of 10 Lohmann Brown laying hens were subjected to each of the following treatments: two horizontal perches separated by 30 degrees or 60 degrees and either directly, horizontally or vertically separated by a set distance of 50 cm. Birds were required to move both up and down between perches. 7. Birds negotiated horizontally-separated perches more successfully at 30 degrees than at 60 degrees. However, when the vertical distance between the perches was 50 cm there was no significant difference in the ability of birds to move downward at 30 degrees or 60 degrees. For birds moving upward, 60 degrees was easier to negotiate than 30 degrees. 8. The vertical and horizontal separations, as well as the different angles affected the ability of birds to move between perches. There was a general decreasing trend in ability with increasing vertical separation between perches. 9. The findings are important in terms of arrangements of perches to improve bird welfare. To minimise the risk of injury, the angle between perches at different heights should be no more than 45 degrees, and the horizontal and vertical distances between these perches minimised, to allow the birds to be able to move downwards more easily.
摘要
  1. 本文描述了鸟类如何在不同高度的水平栖木之间移动,这些栖木之间以不同角度分隔,通过完成任务的时间以及未能完成任务的鸟类数量来表明其能力。2. 在第一个实验中,4组每组15只鸟(ISA褐壳蛋鸡)接受了每种实验处理(使用三根栖木,它们之间的角度分别为0度(水平对照)、30度、45度或60度)。在每种处理中,要求鸟类先在栖木之间向上移动,然后作为实验的第二部分,再在栖木之间向下移动。3. 鸟类在60度角的栖木之间向上移动所用的时间比在其他任何角度都要长得多。没有鸟类未能完成任务。4. 对于在栖木之间向下移动的鸟类,完成任务的中位时间随角度显著增加。此外,未能完成任务的鸟类数量也随角度增加。5. 进行了第二个实验,以测试距离的垂直或水平分量是否会影响鸟类在以不同角度分隔的栖木间移动的能力。6. 在第二个实验中,4组每组10只罗曼褐壳蛋鸡接受了以下每种处理:两根水平栖木,角度相隔30度或60度,且水平或垂直直接相隔固定距离50厘米。要求鸟类在栖木之间上下移动。7. 鸟类在30度角时比在60度角时更能成功地在水平分隔的栖木间移动。然而,当栖木之间的垂直距离为50厘米时,鸟类在30度或60度角向下移动的能力没有显著差异。对于向上移动的鸟类,60度角比30度角更容易通过。8. 垂直和水平分隔以及不同角度都会影响鸟类在栖木间移动的能力。随着栖木之间垂直分隔的增加,能力总体呈下降趋势。9. 这些发现对于改善鸟类福利的栖木布置具有重要意义。为了将受伤风险降至最低,不同高度栖木之间的角度应不超过45度,并且这些栖木之间的水平和垂直距离应最小化,以便鸟类能够更轻松地向下移动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验