Fenton R R, Easdale W J, Er H M, O'Mara S M, McKeage M J, Russell P J, Hambley T W
School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Med Chem. 1997 Mar 28;40(7):1090-8. doi: 10.1021/jm9607966.
A pair of enantiomeric Pt(II) complexes, [Pt(R-ahaz)Cl2] and [Pt(S-ahaz)Cl2] (ahaz = 3-aminohexahydroazepine), has been investigated for their ability to bind enantioselectively to DNA. Improved synthetic procedures were developed for preparing both the ligands and the Pt complexes. The structure of the complex of the S enantiomer was determined by X-ray crystallographic methods. Crystals of [Pt(S-ahaz)Cl2] are orthorhombic, space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with a = 6.917(1) A, b = 11.167(1) A, c = 12.373(2) A, Z = 4, and the structure was refined to R = 0.023 (1505F). Molecular modeling techniques were used to investigate the role of steric interactions between the ligand and DNA in influencing the bifunctional binding of the two enantiomers, and it was found that the S enantiomer should bind more readily. The binding of the S enantiomer, to calf thymus DNA, was indeed found to be slightly greater than that for the R enantiomer though slightly less than that for cis-DDP. Assays of the proportion of monofunctional adducts showed that a substantially greater proportion of monofunctional adducts remained for the R enantiomer and cisplatin than for the S enantiomer. Each of the enantiomers was subjected to in vitro cytotoxicity assays using cultures of human bladder (BL13/0), lung and resistant lung (PC9 and PC9cisR), and prostate (DU145) cancer cells. The R enantiomer was found to be slightly more cytotoxic in the bladder cell line and may be less cytotoxic in the lung cell line but there were no significant differences in the resistant cell line nor in the prostate cell line. The two enantiomers were taken up equally by the bladder cancer cells.
研究了一对对映体铂(II)配合物[Pt(R-ahaz)Cl2]和[Pt(S-ahaz)Cl2](ahaz = 3-氨基六氢氮杂卓)对DNA的对映选择性结合能力。开发了改进的合成方法来制备配体和铂配合物。通过X射线晶体学方法确定了S对映体配合物的结构。[Pt(S-ahaz)Cl2]的晶体为正交晶系,空间群P2(1)2(1)2(1),a = 6.917(1) Å,b = 11.167(1) Å,c = 12.373(2) Å,Z = 4,结构精修至R = 0.023(1505个F)。使用分子建模技术研究了配体与DNA之间的空间相互作用在影响两种对映体双功能结合中的作用,发现S对映体应该更容易结合。实际上发现S对映体与小牛胸腺DNA的结合略大于R对映体,但略小于顺铂。单功能加合物比例的测定表明,R对映体和顺铂残留的单功能加合物比例比S对映体大得多。使用人膀胱(BL13/0)、肺和耐药肺(PC9和PC9cisR)以及前列腺(DU145)癌细胞培养物对每种对映体进行体外细胞毒性测定。发现R对映体在膀胱细胞系中细胞毒性略高,在肺细胞系中细胞毒性可能较低,但在耐药细胞系和前列腺细胞系中没有显著差异。两种对映体被膀胱癌细胞等量摄取。