McCollum M A, Ward S C
Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Ohio 44242, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997 Mar;102(3):377-405. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199703)102:3<377::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-S.
The present analysis evaluated extant hominoid subnasal morphological variation from an ontogenetic perspective, documenting both qualitative and allometric details of subnasal maturation in Hylobates, great apes and modern humans. With respect to intraspecific variation, results of log-linear modeling procedures indicate that qualitative features of the subnasal region shown previously to discriminate extant taxa (Ward and Kimbel, 1983; McCollum et al., 1993) do not vary appreciably with either age or sex. In terms of quantitative variation, aside from observed changes in the position of the anterior attachment of the nasal septal cartilage relative to the lateral margins of the nasal cavity, the morphology of the subnasal region does not vary appreciably with age. Furthermore, it was found that sexual dimorphism in subnasal form is present only in Pongo and Gorilla and is the result of sexual bimaturism rather than sexual variation in canine size. In considering interspecific variation in subnasal form, there is a propensity among hominoid taxa for the nasal cavity floor to be free of substantial topographic relief. The smoothly continuous nasal floor topography identified in the majority of hominoid taxa appears to be produced by extensive resorption of the anterior nasal cavity floor that accompanies an upward rotation of the anterior maxilla during craniofacial ontogeny. Comparisons of ontogenetic allometric trajectories indicate that relatively little of the variation in hominoid subnasal form can early be attributed to variation in body/cranial size. Instead, variation in craniofacial orientation, vascular anatomy and incisor size and inclination were identified as potential mediators of hominoid subnasoalveolar anatomy. Although results of this analysis confirm that many detail of the orangutan subnasal morphology are derived for this taxon, there is only little conclusive evidence to support recent reports that the morphology displayed by Gorilla is primitive for great apes.
本分析从个体发育的角度评估了现存类人猿鼻下形态变异,记录了长臂猿、大猩猩和现代人类鼻下成熟的定性和异速生长细节。关于种内变异,对数线性建模程序的结果表明,先前显示可区分现存分类群的鼻下区域定性特征(沃德和金贝尔,1983年;麦科勒姆等人,1993年)在年龄和性别上均无明显变化。在定量变异方面,除了观察到鼻中隔软骨前附着相对于鼻腔外侧边缘位置的变化外,鼻下区域的形态在年龄上无明显变化。此外,发现鼻下形态的两性异形仅存在于猩猩和大猩猩中,是性双熟的结果,而非犬齿大小的性别差异。在考虑鼻下形态的种间变异时,类人猿分类群中存在鼻腔底部没有明显地形起伏的倾向。在大多数类人猿分类群中识别出的平滑连续的鼻腔底部地形似乎是由颅面个体发育过程中上颌前部向上旋转伴随的鼻腔前部底部广泛吸收产生的。个体发育异速生长轨迹的比较表明,类人猿鼻下形态的变异在早期相对较少可归因于身体/颅骨大小的变异。相反,颅面方向、血管解剖结构以及门齿大小和倾斜度的变异被确定为类人猿鼻牙槽解剖结构的潜在调节因素。尽管本分析的结果证实了猩猩鼻下形态的许多细节是该分类群特有的,但几乎没有确凿证据支持最近的报道,即大猩猩所显示的形态是大猩猩的原始形态。