Suppr超能文献

牙科陶瓷的挠曲试验。

Flexure tests on dental ceramics.

作者信息

Zeng K, Odén A, Rowcliffe D

机构信息

Department of Mateials Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Sep-Oct;9(5):434-9.

PMID:9108743
Abstract

The failure stresses in flexural tests of a densely sintered high-purity alumina (Procera AllCeram) were evaluated using three-point bend, ring-on-ring, and piston-on-three-ball tests. Glass-infiltrated presintered alumina (In-Ceram) and leucite-reinforced porcelain (IPS Empress) disks with the same dimensions were also tested using ring-on-ring and piston-on-three-ball tests. The failure stresses for all materials were substantially different (up to 50%) with different testing methods, and cannot be directly compared. However, by considering the effective specimen area under the maximum tensile stress, these failure stress data could be compared. The results emphasize the importance of knowing the test method and the method of calculation when comparing data. These three testing methods were also subjected to Weibull analysis. The Procera AllCeram had a consistently higher failure stress than the other two materials.

摘要

采用三点弯曲、环-环和活塞-三球试验对致密烧结的高纯氧化铝(Procera AllCeram)进行弯曲试验,评估其失效应力。还使用环-环和活塞-三球试验对尺寸相同的玻璃渗透预烧结氧化铝(In-Ceram)和白榴石增强瓷(IPS Empress)圆盘进行了测试。所有材料在不同测试方法下的失效应力有显著差异(高达50%),无法直接比较。然而,通过考虑最大拉应力下的有效试样面积,可以比较这些失效应力数据。结果强调了在比较数据时了解测试方法和计算方法的重要性。还对这三种测试方法进行了威布尔分析。Procera AllCeram的失效应力始终高于其他两种材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验