Sgouros S, Goldin J H, Hockley A D, Wake M J
Department of Craniofacial Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Craniofac Surg. 1996 Jul;7(4):284-9. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199607000-00007.
Debate still exists concerning the extent of frontal reconstruction for the correction of plagiocephaly resulting from unilateral coronal synostosis. Between 1982 and 1994, 38 patients with unilateral coronal synostosis have been treated in our department. Initially, a unilateral frontal craniotomy with advancement of the ipsilateral supraorbital bar was used in 13 patients. An unsatisfactory postoperative appearance of the forehead led to modification of the technique using a bilateral frontal bone flap. This allowed simpler and improved forehead reconstruction. The method was used in 22 patients. Three patients with severe deformity had the complete supraorbital bar advanced in one piece and the forehead reconstructed with a bilateral frontal flap. The late results were analyzed using a clinical scoring system to grade residual deformity. The patients in the two main groups had similar characteristics. The mean age at first operation was 30.8 months for the first group and 20.1 months for the second group. Mean length of follow-up was 7.9 years for the first group and 4.6 years for the second group. No significant operative complications were observed. In two patients, one from each group, recurrent deformity developed, requiring further surgery. Analysis of the mean scores obtained at set intervals during the first 4 postoperative years showed that forehead correction with a bilateral frontal bone segment and unilateral supraorbital bar advancement provides better early cosmetic results in the first postoperative year. After that interval, the results of the two techniques are similar, with overall good final cosmetic appearances. The patients in the third group who had the complete supraorbital bar advancement with bilateral frontal bone remodeling had more pronounced deformity initially and had a less satisfactory late result. These findings confirm the clinical impression that bilateral frontal bone remodeling offers a better immediate surgical result from the cosmetic point of view compared with other techniques.
关于单侧冠状缝早闭所致斜头畸形的额部重建范围仍存在争议。1982年至1994年间,我科共治疗了38例单侧冠状缝早闭患者。最初,13例患者采用了同侧眶上缘骨条推进的单侧额部开颅术。术后前额外观不满意,促使我们改进技术,采用双侧额骨瓣。这使得前额重建更简单且效果更好。该方法应用于22例患者。3例严重畸形患者将完整的眶上缘骨条整体推进,并用双侧额部皮瓣重建前额。采用临床评分系统分析远期结果,以评估残留畸形程度。两个主要组别的患者具有相似特征。第一组首次手术的平均年龄为30.8个月,第二组为20.1个月。第一组的平均随访时间为7.9年,第二组为4.6年。未观察到明显的手术并发症。两组各有1例患者出现复发畸形,需要进一步手术。对术后前4年定期获得的平均评分进行分析表明,双侧额骨段和单侧眶上缘骨条推进的前额矫正术在术后第一年能提供更好的早期美容效果。在此之后,两种技术的效果相似,最终美容外观总体良好。第三组患者采用双侧额骨重塑并完整推进眶上缘骨条,最初畸形更明显,远期效果不太理想。这些发现证实了临床印象,即从美容角度来看,与其他技术相比,双侧额骨重塑能提供更好的即刻手术效果。