MacGowan A P, Feeney R, Brown I, McCulloch S Y, Reeves D S, Lovering A M
Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research & Evaluation, Southmead Health Services NHS Trust and the University of Bristol, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Apr;39(4):537-41. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.4.537.
We conducted a prospective observational study on the medical management and health service resource utilization associated with the hospital care of patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection. Between January 1994 and June 1995, 28 such patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea; these 28 patients were matched with 56 age-matched patients, who were used as a control group in a comparative study. Progress during the first week after admission was similar as measured by fever days and pathology or radiology use. The use of iv cephalosporins (g/day) during the first week was greater in the group who developed C. difficile-associated diarrhoea than in controls. The length of hospital stay was 36.4 +/- 21.6 days in patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhoea compared with 19.8 +/- 13.3 days in controls. Cases also required more pathological and radiological tests and greater use of antimicrobials and other drugs; however, if pathology and radiology use was calculated per day of patient stay there was no difference between the two groups. When antimicrobial use was compared, controlling for the time taken until found to be C. difficile toxin positive, patients with C. difficile infection received more iv cefuroxime as well as more total cephalosporins, beta-lactams and macrolides measured in g/day. Interestingly, in this study we could not show an increased mortality associated with C. difficile diarrhoea despite obvious evidence of morbidity. The development of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea substantially increases health care resource utilization for individual patients who are admitted to hospital with lower respiratory tract infection.
我们针对社区获得性下呼吸道感染患者的医院护理相关的医疗管理及卫生服务资源利用情况开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。在1994年1月至1995年6月期间,28例此类患者发生了艰难梭菌相关性腹泻;这28例患者与56例年龄匹配的患者进行了匹配,后者作为对照纳入一项对比研究。入院后第一周的病情进展,通过发热天数以及病理检查或影像学检查的使用情况来衡量,结果相似。发生艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的患者组在第一周静脉用头孢菌素的使用量(克/天)高于对照组。艰难梭菌相关性腹泻患者的住院时间为36.4±21.6天,而对照组为19.8±13.3天。病例组还需要更多的病理和影像学检查,以及更多地使用抗菌药物和其他药物;然而,如果按患者住院天数计算病理检查和影像学检查的使用量,则两组之间没有差异。在比较抗菌药物使用情况时,在控制直至检测出艰难梭菌毒素阳性所需时间的情况下,艰难梭菌感染患者接受了更多的静脉用头孢呋辛,以及更多的总头孢菌素、β-内酰胺类药物和大环内酯类药物,以克/天来衡量。有趣的是,在本研究中,尽管有明显的发病证据,但我们并未发现艰难梭菌腹泻会增加死亡率。对于因下呼吸道感染入院的个体患者,艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的发生大幅增加了卫生保健资源的利用。