Frerking M, Wilson M
Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Biophys J. 1996 May;70(5):2078-91. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79774-6.
The strength of synaptic connections between two neurons is characterized by the number of release sites (N) on the presynaptic cell, the probability (p) of transmitter release at those sites in response to a stimulus, and the average size (A) of the postsynaptic response from each site. Quantal analysis can determine N, p, and A, but the large variance in the amplitudes of minis at central synapses is predicted to obscure quantal peaks and render quantal analysis unusable. Recently it has been suggested that the variance in mini amplitude is generated by differences between release sites, rather than by quantum-to-quantum fluctuations at identical sites, and that this form of variance in mini amplitude reduces the amount of variance expected in quantal peaks. Using simulations, we examine the possibility of resolving quantal peaks assuming either form of variance in mini amplitude. We find that individual quantal peaks are resolvable in neither case, provided that the uniquantal distribution is similar to the mini distribution. Because this lack of resolution compromises the utility of quantal analysis, we develop a general description that can solve N and p, given the statistical parameters of the mini distribution and the evoked distribution. We find that this description is relatively insensitive to the source of variance in mini amplitude.
两个神经元之间突触连接的强度由突触前细胞上释放位点的数量(N)、这些位点对刺激做出反应时递质释放的概率(p)以及每个位点突触后反应的平均大小(A)来表征。量子分析可以确定N、p和A,但预计中枢突触微小突触后电流(mEPSC)幅度的巨大差异会掩盖量子峰,使量子分析无法使用。最近有人提出,微小突触后电流幅度的差异是由释放位点之间的差异产生的,而不是由相同位点的量子间波动产生的,并且这种微小突触后电流幅度的差异形式减少了量子峰中预期的差异量。我们使用模拟来研究在假设微小突触后电流幅度的两种差异形式下解析量子峰的可能性。我们发现,只要单量子分布与微小突触后电流分布相似,在这两种情况下单个量子峰都无法解析。由于这种缺乏分辨率损害了量子分析的效用,我们开发了一种通用描述,在给定微小突触后电流分布和诱发分布的统计参数的情况下,可以求解N和p。我们发现这种描述对微小突触后电流幅度差异的来源相对不敏感。