• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胎儿纤连蛋白作为高危患者样本中早产的标志物]

[Fetal fibronectin as a marker of prematurity in a high risk patient sample].

作者信息

Surbek D, Bösiger H, Pavic N, Huber P, Almendral A C, Holzgreve W

机构信息

Universitäts-Frauenklinik Basel.

出版信息

Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 1997 Jan-Feb;201(1):15-20.

PMID:9172901
Abstract

The accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth was studied in patients with increased risk for preterm delivery (according to the Creasy-score). In a prospective blind observational study the smear from the posterior fornix vaginae of 56 pregnant patients without PROM was examined using a quantitative immunoassay for the detection of fetal fibronectin. The patients who tested positively for fetal fibronectin had significantly more preterm deliveries than those with a negative result (CHI square-test, p < 0.01, RR 5.1). Overall, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 56%, 87%, 45% and 91%, respectively. In patients with preterm labor these values were 75%, 87%, 60%, and 93%, respectively. No patient with a negative result delivered preterm during the following two weeks. It is concluded that performing the fetal fibronectin test in patients with preterm labor is useful for the prediction of preterm birth. Routine testing in patients at increased risk (asymptomatic patients) is not recommended for lack of effectiveness.

摘要

在早产风险增加的患者(根据Creasy评分)中,研究了宫颈阴道胎儿纤连蛋白作为早产预测指标的准确性。在一项前瞻性盲法观察研究中,使用定量免疫测定法对56例无胎膜早破的孕妇阴道后穹窿涂片进行检查,以检测胎儿纤连蛋白。胎儿纤连蛋白检测呈阳性的患者早产的比例明显高于检测结果为阴性的患者(卡方检验,p<0.01,相对危险度5.1)。总体而言,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为56%、87%、45%和91%。在早产患者中,这些值分别为75%、87%、60%和93%。检测结果为阴性的患者在接下来的两周内均未早产。结论是,对早产患者进行胎儿纤连蛋白检测有助于预测早产。由于缺乏有效性,不建议对风险增加的患者(无症状患者)进行常规检测。

相似文献

1
[Fetal fibronectin as a marker of prematurity in a high risk patient sample].[胎儿纤连蛋白作为高危患者样本中早产的标志物]
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 1997 Jan-Feb;201(1):15-20.
2
"Blind" vaginal fetal fibronectin as a predictor of spontaneous preterm delivery.“盲法”阴道胎儿纤连蛋白作为自发性早产的预测指标
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):285-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152385.46980.ef.
3
[Rational use of fetal fibronectin in the evaluation of premature labor risk].[胎儿纤连蛋白在早产风险评估中的合理应用]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1996;25(3):288-93.
4
[Quantitative determination of fetal fibronectin in cervical smears: a new marker for evaluating the risk of premature labor].[宫颈涂片胎儿纤连蛋白的定量测定:评估早产风险的新标志物]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Dec;54(12):685-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023624.
5
Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery.宫颈和阴道分泌物中的胎儿纤连蛋白作为早产的预测指标
N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 5;325(10):669-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109053251001.
6
Assessment of rapid fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery.快速检测胎儿纤连蛋白预测早产的评估
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):280-4. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000150557.00298.47.
7
[Fetal fibronectin and cervical length as early predictors of preterm labor].[胎儿纤连蛋白和宫颈长度作为早产的早期预测指标]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011 Jun;79(6):337-43.
8
Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth: an overview.胎儿纤连蛋白作为早产预测指标的概述
Am J Perinatol. 1998;15(11):613-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994079.
9
[Is fetal fibronectin a valid test predictive of premature labor?].[胎儿纤连蛋白是预测早产的有效检测指标吗?]
Contracept Fertil Sex. 1997 May;25(5):380-4.
10
[Premature labor and fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions].[早产与宫颈及阴道分泌物中的胎儿纤维连接蛋白]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Jul;54(7):414-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022869.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review.宫颈阴道胎儿纤连蛋白检测预测自发性早产风险的准确性:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):301. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.301.