Walter T, Griessl G, Kluge P, Neugebauer A
Abteilung Kardiologie/Angiologie, Universität Leipzig.
Z Kardiol. 1997 Mar;86(3):204-10. doi: 10.1007/s003920050052.
QT-dispersion (QTD) in 12-lead surface-ECG and QT-dynamics in Holter-ECG, defined as the time-course of the frequency corrected QT-interval (mQTc), were determined in 42 patients with coronary artery disease in chronic postinfarction stadium without ventricular tachyarrhythmias (CAD/VTA-) and in 24 CAD patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (CAD/VTA+). 14 healthy volunteers served as control group (CG). Correlations with hemodynamic data (LVEF, severity of CAD) and with other risk-parameters (ventricular late potentials, short-time heart rate variability) were calculated. QTD in CAD/VTA-was significantly higher compared to CG (48.4 ms+/- 19.6 vs 31.4 ms +/- 9.8, p < 0.05). There were no intergroup differences in QT-dynamics. CAD/VTA+ patients showed the highest QTD-values (59.5 ms +/- 31.1, p < 0.05 compared to CG/CAD/VTA0) and a significantly altered QT-dynamics compared to CG/CAD/VTA- (mQTc: 431.3 ms +/- 38.8 vs 400.8 ms +/- 25.5 vs 406.3 ms +/- l0.6, p < 0.05). Only parameters of QTD were significantly correlated to severity of CAD (r = +0.41, p < 0.01) and to LVEF (r = 0.43, p < 0.01). We did not find significant correlations between the parameters of QT-dispersion/QT-dynamics among one another and to the risk-parameters. These results indicate that the QT-dispersion in CAD-patients also in chronic post-infarction stadium is elevated and that CAD-patients with VTA are characterized by an altered QT-dynamics. Parameters of both methods are independent of other validated risk-parameters. So the measurement of QT-dispersion and QT-dynamics as markers of inhomogenous repolarization could contribute to an improvement of risk-stratification of CAD-patients.
在42例处于慢性心肌梗死后阶段且无室性快速心律失常的冠心病患者(CAD/VTA-)以及24例患有室性快速心律失常的冠心病患者(CAD/VTA+)中,测定了12导联体表心电图中的QT离散度(QTD)以及动态心电图中的QT动态变化(定义为频率校正QT间期(mQTc)的时程)。14名健康志愿者作为对照组(CG)。计算了其与血流动力学数据(左心室射血分数、冠心病严重程度)以及其他风险参数(心室晚电位、短程心率变异性)的相关性。与对照组相比,CAD/VTA-患者的QTD显著更高(48.4毫秒±19.6 vs 31.4毫秒±9.8,p<0.05)。QT动态变化在组间无差异。CAD/VTA+患者的QTD值最高(59.5毫秒±31.1,与CG/CAD/VTA-相比p<0.05),并且与CG/CAD/VTA-相比QT动态变化显著改变(mQTc:431.3毫秒±38.8 vs 400.8毫秒±25.5 vs 406.3毫秒±10.6,p<0.05)。仅QTD参数与冠心病严重程度(r = +0.41,p<0.01)和左心室射血分数(r = 0.43,p<0.01)显著相关。我们未发现QT离散度/QT动态变化参数之间以及与风险参数之间存在显著相关性。这些结果表明,即使在慢性心肌梗死后阶段,冠心病患者的QT离散度也会升高,并且患有室性快速心律失常的冠心病患者具有改变的QT动态变化。这两种方法的参数均独立于其他经过验证的风险参数。因此,测量QT离散度和QT动态变化作为复极不均一性的标志物可能有助于改善冠心病患者的风险分层。