Suppr超能文献

用于递送沙丁胺醇的Spacehaler:与标准定量吸入器加Volumatic储雾罐装置的比较。

The Spacehaler for delivery of salbutamol: a comparison with the standard metered-dose inhaler plus Volumatic spacer device.

作者信息

Gunawardena K A, Sohal T, Jones J I, Upchurch F C, Crompton G K

机构信息

Children International Ltd, Slough, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1997 May;91(5):311-6. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90035-4.

Abstract

The Spacehaler is a new, compact, pressurized aerosol device that uses the same canister as a conventional metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Its design, however, reduces the velocity of the aerosol cloud that emerges from the inhaler, thereby reducing the amount of the non-respirable fraction of the drug delivered to the patient. Large volume spacers achieve a similar effect, but they are bulky and therefore inconvenient to use and carry around. This study compared the bronchodilator effect of 200 micrograms salbutamol delivered by the Spacehaler to that of an MDI used with a Volumatic spacer (MDI plus spacer) in patients with reversible obstructive airways disease. Twenty-five patients with asthma, having a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) between 50 and 90% predicted and a reversibility of > or = 15% to 200 micrograms salbutamol given by the conventional (standard) MDI entered the study. On two separate study days, they inhaled 200 micrograms salbutamol either via the Spacehaler or the MDI plus spacer. To maintain blinding, they received placebo on both study days via the alternate device. Their FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured before and at regular intervals for 6 h after inhalation. Assessment of equivalence between the two devices was based on whether the 90% confidence interval for the difference between the weighted mean FEV1 was within +/- 0.25 1. Patient preference was assessed by a questionnaire at the end of the second study day. Twenty-four patients completed the study. Both devices produced a significant improvement in FEV1 (P < 0.02). The upper and lower 90% confidence limits for the difference in weighted mean FEV1 between the devices was +/- 0.041, and the 99% confidence limits were +0.061 and -0.071. The weighted means for FVC and PEF, and the duration of effect and peak responses for FEV1, FVC and PEF also showed no difference between the two devices. Patients found no difficulty in using the Spacehaler, and 20 out of 24 patients (83.3%) preferred it to the MDI plus spacer. The bronchodilator effect of 200 micrograms salbutamol administered by a Spacehaler was equivalent to that produced by an MDI plus spacer in this group of patients with reversible airways obstruction. The majority of patients preferred it to a large volume spacer.

摘要

太空吸入器是一种新型的、紧凑的、加压气雾剂装置,它使用与传统定量吸入器(MDI)相同的药罐。然而,其设计降低了从吸入器中喷出的气雾剂云的速度,从而减少了输送给患者的不可吸入药物部分的量。大容量储雾罐也能达到类似效果,但它们体积庞大,因此使用和携带都不方便。本研究比较了太空吸入器输送200微克沙丁胺醇与使用Volumatic储雾罐的MDI(MDI加储雾罐)在可逆性阻塞性气道疾病患者中的支气管扩张作用。25名哮喘患者进入研究,他们1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)在预测值的50%至90%之间,对传统(标准)MDI给予的200微克沙丁胺醇的可逆性≥15%。在两个不同的研究日,他们通过太空吸入器或MDI加储雾罐吸入200微克沙丁胺醇。为保持盲法,他们在两个研究日通过另一种装置接受安慰剂。在吸入前及吸入后6小时定期测量他们的FEV1、用力肺活量(FVC)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)。两种装置等效性的评估基于加权平均FEV1差异的90%置信区间是否在±0.25升范围内。在第二个研究日结束时通过问卷调查评估患者偏好。24名患者完成了研究。两种装置均使FEV1有显著改善(P<0.02)。两种装置加权平均FEV1差异的9上和90%置信限为±0.04升,99%置信限为+0.06升和-0.07升。FVC和PEF的加权平均值,以及FEV1、FVC和PEF的作用持续时间和峰值反应在两种装置之间也无差异。患者使用太空吸入器没有困难,2组患者中有20名(83.3%)更喜欢它而不是MDI加储雾罐。在这组可逆性气道阻塞患者中,太空吸入器给予200微克沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张作用与MDI加储雾罐产生的作用相当。大多数患者更喜欢它而不是大容量储雾罐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验