Englund J A, Baker C J, Raskino C, McKinney R E, Petrie B, Fowler M G, Pearson D, Gershon A, McSherry G D, Abrams E J, Schliozberg J, Sullivan J L
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12;336(24):1704-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706123362403.
Zidovudine has been the drug of choice for the initial treatment of symptomatic children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with zidovudine alone as compared with either didanosine alone or combination therapy with zidovudine plus didanosine.
In this multicenter, double-blind study, symptomatic HIV-infected children 3 months through 18 years of age were stratified according to age (<30 months or > or =30 months) and randomly assigned to receive zidovudine, didanosine, or zidovudine plus didanosine. The primary end point was length of time to death or to progression of HIV disease.
Of the 831 children who could be evaluated, 92 percent had never received antiretroviral therapy and 90 percent had acquired HIV perinatally. An interim analysis (median follow-up, 23 months) showed a significantly higher risk of HIV-disease progression or death in patients receiving zidovudine alone than in those receiving combination therapy (relative risk, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.88; P=0.007). The study arm with zidovudine alone was stopped and unblinded; the other two treatment arms were continued. At the end of the study, didanosine alone had an efficacy similar to that of zidovudine plus didanosine (median follow-up, 32 months) (relative risk of disease progression or death, 0.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.37; P=0.91). A significantly lower risk of anemia or neutropenia was seen in patients receiving didanosine alone (P=0.036).
In symptomatic HIV-infected children, treatment with either didanosine alone or zidovudine plus didanosine was more effective than treatment with zidovudine alone. The efficacy of didanosine alone was similar to that of the combination therapy and was associated with less hematologic toxicity.
齐多夫定一直是有症状的感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)儿童初始治疗的首选药物。本试验旨在评估单独使用齐多夫定治疗与单独使用去羟肌苷或齐多夫定加去羟肌苷联合治疗的疗效和安全性。
在这项多中心、双盲研究中,对3个月至18岁有症状的HIV感染儿童按年龄(<30个月或≥30个月)分层,并随机分配接受齐多夫定、去羟肌苷或齐多夫定加去羟肌苷治疗。主要终点是死亡或HIV疾病进展的时间长度。
在831名可评估的儿童中,92%从未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗,90%在出生时感染了HIV。一项中期分析(中位随访23个月)显示,单独接受齐多夫定治疗的患者HIV疾病进展或死亡的风险显著高于接受联合治疗的患者(相对风险,0.61;95%置信区间,0.42至0.88;P=0.007)。单独使用齐多夫定的研究组停止治疗并揭盲;其他两个治疗组继续治疗。在研究结束时,单独使用去羟肌苷的疗效与齐多夫定加去羟肌苷相似(中位随访32个月)(疾病进展或死亡的相对风险,0.98;95%置信区间,0.70至1.37;P=0.91)。单独接受去羟肌苷治疗的患者贫血或中性粒细胞减少的风险显著较低(P=0.036)。
在有症状的HIV感染儿童中,单独使用去羟肌苷或齐多夫定加去羟肌苷治疗比单独使用齐多夫定更有效。单独使用去羟肌苷的疗效与联合治疗相似,且血液学毒性较小。