Linzer M, Yang E H, Estes N A, Wang P, Vorperian V R, Kapoor W N
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Madison 53792-2454, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 15;126(12):989-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00012.
To review the literature on diagnostic testing in syncope and provide recommendations for a comprehensive, cost-effective approach to establishing its cause.
Studies were identified through a MEDLINE search (1980 to present) and a manual review of bibliographies of identified articles.
Papers were eligible if they addressed diagnostic testing in syncope or near syncope and reported results for at least 10 patients.
The usefulness of tests was assessed by calculating diagnostic yield: the number of patients with diagnostically positive test results divided by the number of patients tested or, in the case of monitoring studies, the sum of true-positive and true-negative test results divided by the number of patients tested.
Despite the absence of a diagnostic gold standard and the paucity of data from randomized trials, several points emerge. First, history, physical examination, and electrocardiography are the core of the syncope workup (combined diagnostic yield, 50%). Second, neurologic testing is rarely helpful unless additional neurologic signs or symptoms are present (diagnostic yield of electroencephalography, computed tomography, and Doppler ultrasonography, 2% to 6%). Third, patients in whom heart disease is known or suspected or those with exertional syncope are at higher risk for adverse outcomes and should have cardiac testing, including echocardiography, stress testing. Holter monitoring, or intracardiac electrophysiologic studies, alone or in combination (diagnostic yields, 5% to 35%). Fourth, syncope in the elderly often results from polypharmacy and abnormal physiologic responses to daily events. Fifth, long-term loop electrocardiography (diagnostic yield, 25% to 35%) and tilt testing (diagnostic yield < or = 60%) are most useful in patients with recurrent syncope in whom heart disease is not suspected. Sixth, psychiatric evaluation can detect mental disorders associated with syncope in up to 25% of cases. Seventh, hospitalization may be indicated for patients at high risk for cardiac syncope (those with an abnormal electrocardiogram, organic heart disease, chest pain, history of arrhythmia, age > 70 years) or with acute neurologic signs.
Many tests for syncope have a low diagnostic yield. A careful history, physical examination, and electrocardiography will provide a diagnosis or determine whether diagnostic testing is necessary in most patients.
回顾关于晕厥诊断检测的文献,并为全面、经济高效地确定其病因提供建议。
通过MEDLINE检索(1980年至今)以及对已识别文章的参考文献进行人工检索来确定研究。
如果论文涉及晕厥或接近晕厥的诊断检测且报告了至少10例患者的结果,则符合入选标准。
通过计算诊断率来评估检测的有用性:诊断检测结果为阳性的患者数量除以接受检测的患者数量;或者在监测研究中,真阳性和真阴性检测结果之和除以接受检测的患者数量。
尽管缺乏诊断金标准且随机试验数据较少,但仍有几点结论。首先,病史、体格检查和心电图是晕厥检查的核心(联合诊断率为50%)。其次,除非存在其他神经系统体征或症状,否则神经学检测很少有帮助(脑电图、计算机断层扫描和多普勒超声检查的诊断率为2%至6%)。第三,已知或怀疑患有心脏病的患者或有劳力性晕厥的患者发生不良后果的风险较高,应进行心脏检测,包括超声心动图、负荷试验、动态心电图监测或心内电生理检查,单独或联合使用(诊断率为5%至35%)。第四,老年人晕厥常由多种药物治疗以及对日常事件的异常生理反应引起。第五,长期动态心电图监测(诊断率为25%至35%)和直立倾斜试验(诊断率≤60%)对怀疑无心脏病的复发性晕厥患者最有用。第六,精神科评估在高达25%的病例中可检测出与晕厥相关的精神障碍。第七,对于心脏性晕厥高危患者(心电图异常、器质性心脏病、胸痛、心律失常病史、年龄>70岁)或有急性神经系统体征的患者,可能需要住院治疗。
许多晕厥检测的诊断率较低。仔细的病史、体格检查和心电图检查将为大多数患者提供诊断或确定是否需要进行诊断检测。