Mirza D F, Narsimhan K L, Ferraz Neto B H, Mayer A D, McMaster P, Buckels J A
Liver and Hepatobiliary Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Br J Surg. 1997 Jun;84(6):786-90.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher incidence of bile duct injury than open cholecystectomy. This study reviews the management of bile duct injury in a tertiary hepatobiliary unit.
From 1991 to 1995, 27 patients (18 women) of median age 49 (range 25-67) years were referred to this unit with bile duct injury following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was described as 'uneventful' in 14 and 'difficult' in 13 patients; six injuries were recognized at operation.
Patients were transferred a median of 26 (range 0-990) days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although initial symptoms were recorded a median of 3 (range 0-700) days after cholecystectomy. Fifteen patients underwent additional surgery before referral. Management before referral included surgical exploration (15 patients), endoscopic cholangiography (ERC) and stent insertion (three), external drainage of bile collections (five), and conservative management (five). Management after referral included surgical reconstruction (19 patients), laparotomy with drainage (one), percutaneous drainage (two), ERC and stent insertion (two), percutaneous cholangiography with dilatation and stent placement (three), and conservative management (two). One patient died and the median inpatient stay following referral was 14 (range 7-78) days. Ten of 15 patients who had surgery before referral required a further biliary reconstruction. After median follow-up of 30 (range 3-60) months, four of nine patients with complex high injuries continue to have episodes of cholangitis and one patient has developed secondary biliary cirrhosis.
Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a complex management problem and results in significant postoperative morbidity. Most patients referred after attempted repair require further reconstructive surgery, and patients with complex high injuries have a risk of long-term morbidity.
与开腹胆囊切除术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术导致胆管损伤的发生率更高。本研究回顾了一家三级肝胆单位对胆管损伤的处理情况。
1991年至1995年,27例(18例女性)择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生胆管损伤的患者(中位年龄49岁,范围25 - 67岁)被转诊至本单位。14例患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术被描述为“顺利”,13例为“困难”;6例损伤在手术时被识别。
患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后中位26天(范围0 - 990天)被转诊,尽管最初症状在胆囊切除术后中位3天(范围0 - 700天)被记录。15例患者在转诊前接受了额外手术。转诊前的处理包括手术探查(15例)、内镜胆管造影(ERC)及支架置入(3例)、胆汁积聚的外引流(5例)和保守治疗(5例)。转诊后的处理包括手术重建(19例)、开腹引流(1例)、经皮引流(2例)、ERC及支架置入(2例)、经皮胆管造影及扩张和支架置入(3例)和保守治疗(2例)。1例患者死亡,转诊后的中位住院时间为14天(范围7 - 78天)。转诊前接受手术的15例患者中有10例需要进一步的胆道重建。中位随访30个月(范围3 - 60个月)后,9例复杂高位损伤患者中有4例继续发生胆管炎,1例患者发生继发性胆汁性肝硬化。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆管损伤是一个复杂的处理问题,会导致显著的术后发病率。大多数在尝试修复后转诊的患者需要进一步的重建手术,复杂高位损伤的患者有长期发病的风险。