Chauhan S P, Magann E F, Perry K G, Morrison J C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA.
J Perinatol. 1997 May-Jun;17(3):221-4.
The objective of this study was to determine whether amniotic fluid index < or = 5.0 cm or two-diameter pocket volume < or = 15 cm2 is a predictor of abdominal delivery because of fetal distress or of Apgar score < 7 at 1 or 5 minutes.
The study was prospective and involved 209 parturients in early labor who had ultrasonographic assessment of amniotic fluid volume by both methods.
The incidences of cesarean delivery because of fetal distress and of Apgar scores < 7 at 1 and 5 minutes were 8.1%, 9.0%, and 1.9%, respectively. Only Apgar scores < 7 at 1 minute were significantly higher among patients with a two-diameter pocket < 15 cm2 (16/114) as compared with > 15(2) (3/95, p = 0.007). Oligohydramnios by either method was a poor predictor of adverse outcomes (p values ranging from 0.06 to 0.21). Receiver-operating characteristic curves generated for the amniotic fluid index or two-diameter pocket to predict abdominal delivery because of fetal distress or Apgar scores < 7 at 1 minute indicate that both methods are poor diagnostic tests to predict these complications.
Intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume, by amniotic fluid index or the two-diameter pocket technique, is a poor predictor of adverse neonatal outcome.
本研究的目的是确定羊水指数≤5.0 cm或双径羊水池容积≤15 cm²是否为因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产或1分钟或5分钟时阿氏评分<7分的预测指标。
本研究为前瞻性研究,纳入209例处于分娩早期的产妇,通过两种方法对其羊水容积进行超声评估。
因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产的发生率以及1分钟和5分钟时阿氏评分<7分的发生率分别为8.1%、9.0%和1.9%。双径羊水池<15 cm²的患者(16/114)中仅1分钟时阿氏评分<7分的比例显著高于双径羊水池>15 cm²的患者(3/95,p = 0.007)。两种方法诊断的羊水过少对不良结局的预测价值均较差(p值范围为0.06至0.21)。为预测因胎儿窘迫行剖宫产或1分钟时阿氏评分<7分而绘制的羊水指数或双径羊水池的受试者工作特征曲线表明,这两种方法对预测这些并发症的诊断效能均较差。
通过羊水指数或双径羊水池技术对产时羊水容积进行评估,对不良新生儿结局的预测价值较差。