Hauck R W, Lembeck R M, Emslander H P, Schömig A
Pneumologie der 1. Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar und des Deutschen Herzzentrums, Technische UniversitätMünchen, Germany.
Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):134-44. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.134.
Silicone and metal stents are available for the treatment of malignant bronchial stenoses. This project sought to compare the self-expanding nitinol Accuflex stent (Boston Scientific Corp; Watertown, Mass) with the passively expandable tantalum Strecker stent (Boston Scientific Corp; Watertown, Mass), both implanted by flexible bronchoscopy under local anesthesia and sedation. In 51 patients with malignant bronchial stenosis, 14 nitinol and 51 tantalum stents were used and stenoses of 75 to 100% were treated. The intervention was successful in all but one patient; a mean patency of 93% was achieved. In the follow-up period, the probability of survival was significantly lower in patients with total bronchus occlusion than in patients with stenotic alterations (44 vs 109 days; p<0.05). In 10 patients, lung function analysis after stent implantation revealed a significant increase in PaO2 (65 vs 71 mm Hg; p<0.01), inspiratory vital capacity (2.5 vs 2.7 L; p<0.05), and FEV1 (1.8 vs 2.0 L; p<0.05). Mucus retention was the main (39%) adverse factor in the early phase after stent implantation, whereas tumor penetration became the most frequent problem (67%) in the later phase. Recanalizing interventions were necessary in 18% of the cases in which tumor penetration occurred. Stent distortion occurred in 12 patients with Strecker and in none with Accuflex stents. In comparison to the Strecker stent, the self-expanding Accuflex stent is preferable owing to its excellent flexibility and faster delivery system. Both types of stents could be sufficiently deployed within the lesion and allowed for highly precise positioning. Furthermore, no general anesthesia was required. The fiberbronchoscopic mode of implantation under sedation is very efficient even for tumor patients with severe impairment of their physical and respiratory condition.
硅胶和金属支架可用于治疗恶性支气管狭窄。本项目旨在比较自膨式镍钛合金Accuflex支架(波士顿科学公司;马萨诸塞州沃特敦)和被动膨胀式钽Strecker支架(波士顿科学公司;马萨诸塞州沃特敦),二者均在局部麻醉和镇静下通过可弯曲支气管镜植入。51例恶性支气管狭窄患者中,使用了14个镍钛合金支架和51个钽支架,治疗了75%至100%的狭窄。除1例患者外,干预均成功;平均通畅率达到93%。随访期间,全支气管闭塞患者的生存率显著低于狭窄改变患者(44天对109天;p<0.05)。10例患者支架植入后肺功能分析显示,动脉血氧分压显著升高(65 mmHg对71 mmHg;p<0.01),吸气肺活量(2.5 L对2.7 L;p<0.05),以及第一秒用力呼气容积(1.8 L对2.0 L;p<0.05)。黏液潴留是支架植入后早期的主要不良因素(39%),而肿瘤穿透在后期成为最常见的问题(67%)。在发生肿瘤穿透的病例中,18%需要进行再通干预。12例使用Strecker支架的患者出现支架变形,而使用Accuflex支架的患者无一出现。与Strecker支架相比,自膨式Accuflex支架因其出色的柔韧性和更快的输送系统而更具优势。两种类型的支架都能在病变部位充分展开,并实现高精度定位。此外,无需全身麻醉。即使对于身体和呼吸状况严重受损的肿瘤患者,镇静下纤维支气管镜植入方式也非常有效。