• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脂肪饱和快速自旋回波与传统自旋回波MRI在检测肩袖病变中的比较。

Comparison of fat-saturation fast spin echo versus conventional spin-echo MRI in the detection of rotator cuff pathology.

作者信息

Needell S D, Zlatkin M B

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memortal Regional Hospital, Hollywood, FL 33332, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(4):674-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070411.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.1880070411
PMID:9243387
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of fat-saturation fast-spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted (T2W) sequences with conventional spin-echo (CSE) T2W sequences in the detection of rotator cuff pathology using surgery as the reference standard. Oblique coronal dual-echo CSE and FSE T2W images with fat saturation from 50 surgically confirmed MR shoulder examinations were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Blinded MR readers retrospectively analyzed each imaging sequence separately and ultimately correlated both sequences together with findings at surgery. FSE was 100% sensitive and 94% specific in detection of full-thickness tears (n = 19) and 73% sensitive and 97% specific in the detection of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (n = 13). There was no statistically significant difference in the performance of FSE with fat saturation compared with CSE. The two discrepancies between imaging sequences related to the extent of partial-thickness tears. Our findings suggest that fat-saturation FSE imaging can effectively replace CSE imaging in the evaluation of rotator cuff pathology.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用手术作为参考标准,比较脂肪饱和快速自旋回波(FSE)T2加权(T2W)序列与传统自旋回波(CSE)T2W序列在检测肩袖病变方面的诊断性能。在一台1.5-T磁共振成像扫描仪上,采集了50例经手术证实的肩部磁共振检查的斜冠状面双回波CSE和脂肪饱和FSE T2W图像。不知情的磁共振阅片者分别对每个成像序列进行回顾性分析,并最终将两个序列与手术结果进行关联。FSE在检测全层撕裂(n = 19)时敏感性为100%,特异性为94%;在检测部分厚度肩袖撕裂(n = 13)时敏感性为73%,特异性为97%。与CSE相比,脂肪饱和FSE的性能没有统计学上的显著差异。成像序列之间的两个差异与部分厚度撕裂的程度有关。我们的研究结果表明,脂肪饱和FSE成像在评估肩袖病变时可有效替代CSE成像。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fat-saturation fast spin echo versus conventional spin-echo MRI in the detection of rotator cuff pathology.脂肪饱和快速自旋回波与传统自旋回波MRI在检测肩袖病变中的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Jul-Aug;7(4):674-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880070411.
2
MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears of the shoulder: value of using T2-weighted fat-saturated images.肩部肩袖撕裂的磁共振成像诊断:使用T2加权脂肪抑制图像的价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1451-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754891.
3
Comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo sequences in the MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.快速自旋回波与传统自旋回波序列在肩袖撕裂磁共振诊断中的比较。
Radiat Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;15(2):75-8.
4
Evaluation of shoulder pathology: three-dimensional enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation MR vs two-dimensional fast spin echo T2 fat saturation MR.肩部病变的评估:三维增强T1高分辨率各向同性容积激发磁共振成像与二维快速自旋回波T2脂肪抑制磁共振成像的比较
Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar;88(1047):20140147. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140147. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
MR evaluation of rotator cuff pathology using T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique with and without fat suppression.使用有或没有脂肪抑制的T2加权快速自旋回波技术对肩袖病变进行磁共振评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 May;166(5):1061-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615243.
6
MR imaging of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of T2*-weighted gradient-echo and conventional dual-echo sequences.肩袖肌腱撕裂的磁共振成像:T2*加权梯度回波序列与传统双回波序列的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jun;168(6):1519-24. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168717.
7
Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography of the shoulder.三维各向同性 T1 加权快速自旋回波磁共振关节造影与肩关节二维磁共振关节造影的比较。
Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):921-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111261. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
8
Comparison of fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence and modified STIR sequence in the evaluation of the rotator cuff tendon.脂肪抑制T2加权快速自旋回波序列与改良短TI反转恢复序列在评估肩袖肌腱中的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Aug;185(2):371-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850371.
9
Gradient-echo versus fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MR imaging of rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂的梯度回波与脂肪抑制快速自旋回波磁共振成像
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul;171(1):223-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648793.
10
Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic and two-dimensional conventional indirect MR arthrography for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.三维各向同性与二维常规间接磁共振关节造影在肩袖撕裂诊断中的对比。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):771-80. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.771. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.检测肩袖撕裂:144项诊断研究的网状Meta分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 5;8(2):2325967119900356. doi: 10.1177/2325967119900356. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Role and Correlation of High Resolution Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Patients with Shoulder Pain.高分辨率超声与磁共振成像在肩痛患者评估中的作用及相关性
Pol J Radiol. 2017 Jul 28;82:410-417. doi: 10.12659/PJR.901540. eCollection 2017.
3
A Prospective Comparative Study of High Resolution Ultrasound and MRI in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears in a Tertiary Hospital of North India.
印度北部一家三级医院中高分辨率超声与MRI诊断肩袖撕裂的前瞻性对比研究
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Oct 19;81:491-497. doi: 10.12659/PJR.897830. eCollection 2016.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered.磁共振成像、磁共振关节造影和超声检查用于评估考虑手术治疗的肩部疼痛患者的肩袖撕裂情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24;2013(9):CD009020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2.
5
Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.低场磁共振成像系统中用于脂肪抑制的后处理水脂成像技术:类风湿关节炎患者的评估
MAGMA. 2002 Nov;15(1-3):1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02693838.
6
MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging.肩部磁共振关节造影:低场(0.2T)与高场(1.5T)成像的比较
Eur Radiol. 2000;10(6):989-96. doi: 10.1007/s003300051050.