Suppr超能文献

腋路臂丛神经阻滞——一种在急诊科未得到充分利用的技术。

Axillary brachial plexus block--an underused technique in the accident and emergency department.

作者信息

Mackay C A, Bowden D F

机构信息

Accident and Emergency Department, Manor Hospital, Walsall.

出版信息

J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 Jul;14(4):226-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.4.226.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare axillary brachial plexus block and Bier's block as methods of providing upper limb anaesthesia.

METHODS

Axillary brachial plexus or Bier's blocks were performed on all patients requiring upper limb anaesthesia in a three month period. For Bier's block, a single cuff tourniquet and 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine were used. For axillary plexus block, 40 ml 1% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) were used, given by perivascular or transarterial technique. Prospective analysis was made of time to complete limb anaesthesia, type of procedure performed, and duration of limb anaesthesia. Patient perception of analgesia and satisfaction with the method of anaesthesia was assessed using a 10 point visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

75 patients underwent procedures requiring upper limb anaesthesia; 39 received axillary plexus block and 36 Bier's block. 72% of Bier's blocks and 77% of axillary plexus provided complete anaesthesia without the need for supplemental analgesia. The median time to onset of anaesthesia was 10 min for Bier's block and 32.5 min for axillary block (P < 0.001). The median duration of anaesthesia was 15 min for Bier's block and 240 min for axillary block (P < 0.001). Mean scores for analgesia were 9.7 for axillary blocks and 8.8 for Bier's block (P < 0.001). 87% of the axillary block group were completely satisfied with the method of anaesthesia, compared with 56% of the Bier's block group.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachial plexus blocks are an alternative form of providing upper limb anaesthesia in the accident and emergency department. They are relatively simple to perform, well tolerated by patients, and have the advantage of providing prolonged analgesia without the need for additional medication.

摘要

目的

比较腋路臂丛神经阻滞和静脉局部麻醉作为上肢麻醉方法的效果。

方法

在三个月的时间内,对所有需要上肢麻醉的患者进行腋路臂丛神经阻滞或静脉局部麻醉。静脉局部麻醉采用单袖带止血带,使用3mg/kg的0.5%丙胺卡因。腋路臂丛神经阻滞采用血管周围或经动脉技术,使用40ml含肾上腺素(1:200,000)的1%利多卡因。对完成肢体麻醉的时间、所进行的手术类型和肢体麻醉持续时间进行前瞻性分析。使用10分视觉模拟量表评估患者对镇痛的感受以及对麻醉方法的满意度。

结果

75例患者接受了需要上肢麻醉的手术;39例接受腋路臂丛神经阻滞,36例接受静脉局部麻醉。72%的静脉局部麻醉和77%的腋路臂丛神经阻滞无需补充镇痛即可提供完全麻醉。静脉局部麻醉的麻醉起效中位时间为10分钟,腋路阻滞为32.5分钟(P<0.001)。静脉局部麻醉的麻醉持续中位时间为15分钟,腋路阻滞为240分钟(P<0.001)。腋路阻滞的镇痛平均评分为9.7分,静脉局部麻醉为8.8分(P<0.001)。腋路阻滞组87%的患者对麻醉方法完全满意,而静脉局部麻醉组为56%。

结论

臂丛神经阻滞是在急诊科提供上肢麻醉的一种替代方式。它们操作相对简单,患者耐受性良好,并且具有无需额外用药即可提供长时间镇痛的优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/576a/1342946/1ad638d949c4/jaccidem00019-0025-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验