Wismeijer D, Van Waas M A, Vermeeren J I, Mulder J, Kalk W
Department of Oral Function, Dental School, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Aug;26(4):263-7. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(97)80864-8.
In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 110 edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were treated with International Team for Oral Implantology-dental implants using three different treatment strategies: a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants with ball attachments, two implants with an interconnecting bar, or four interconnected implants. The patients' opinions and their social functioning were evaluated by means of a questionnaire directly before and 16 months after treatment. Before treatment most patients had complaints about the retention of their mandibular denture. Sixteen months after treatment almost all patients were generally satisfied with their dentures. Since no significant difference was found between the three treatment strategies, it was concluded that simple implant treatment such as an overdenture retained by two ball attachments is sufficient.
在一项随机对照临床试验中,110名下颌骨萎缩的无牙患者接受了国际口腔种植学会的种植牙治疗,采用了三种不同的治疗策略:由两个带有球帽附着体的种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿、两个带有连接杆的种植体,或四个相互连接的种植体。在治疗前和治疗后16个月,通过问卷调查对患者的意见及其社会功能进行了评估。治疗前,大多数患者对下颌义齿的固位情况不满意。治疗16个月后,几乎所有患者对其义齿总体满意。由于三种治疗策略之间未发现显著差异,得出的结论是,简单的种植治疗,如由两个球帽附着体固位的覆盖义齿就足够了。