Johnston A, Keown P A, Holt D W
St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, U.K.
Ther Drug Monit. 1997 Aug;19(4):375-81. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199708000-00002.
A critique of the current bioequivalence regulations is presented with reference to critical dose drugs. Using the development of a new cyclosporine formulation as an example, the deficiencies in current bioequivalence testing guidelines are examined and discussed. Based on the experience gained with cyclosporine, recommendations are made on how therapeutic equivalence, rather than just bioequivalence, should be established.
本文针对高风险剂量药物对现行生物等效性法规进行了批判。以一种新的环孢素制剂的研发为例,对现行生物等效性测试指南中的不足之处进行了审视和讨论。基于环孢素的经验,就如何建立治疗等效性而非仅仅生物等效性提出了建议。