Botha C A, Roser D, Rupp W, Paula J A, Kolb I E, Böhm J O, Langenbeck D, Rein J G
Sana Cardiac Surgical Clinic, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Heart Valve Dis. 1997 Jul;6(4):355-60.
The pulmonary autograft operation has achieved broad acceptance and may be the ideal aortic valve substitute. Both the pulmonary autograft and the aortic homograft are more complicated procedures than prosthetic valve replacement. The trend to insert the pulmonary autograft as a root replacement rather than in the subcoronary position has achieved greater uniformity in the results, but there is still confusing diversity in opinions on technical details and anatomical dimensions. The importance of both size and shape mismatches between the three valves involved has received little attention. The valves often differ in diameter and in the shape of the recipient aortic annulus. This uncertainty and the diversity of opinions on essential technical details was disconcerting when we proceeded from aortic homograft-to-pulmonary autograft operations, this was compounded by only a single homograft being available for every operation as we have no homograft bank.
We compared the hemodynamic results regarding various geometric mismatches. All operative details were the same and patients were studied at regular intervals. Comparisons were made in patients with mismatch between recipient aortic annulus and pulmonary autograft. Patients with a normal tricuspid aortic annulus were compared to those with either a circular redo prosthetic valve annulus or a bicuspid recipient annulus. Thirdly we compared the patients with plication of the aortic annulus to those with remodeling of the distal aorta. Lastly we compared mismatch between donor homograft and pulmonary autograft.
No influence of geometric mismatch between the three valves could be found on the results of the pulmonary autograft operation.
Good results are obtainable without a painful learning curve if one keeps to certain surgical principles. It need not be a complicated operation and geometric mismatches between the three valves involved may be compensated for adequately.
肺动脉自体移植手术已被广泛接受,可能是理想的主动脉瓣替代方式。肺动脉自体移植和主动脉同种异体移植都比人工瓣膜置换手术更为复杂。将肺动脉自体移植作为根部置换而非冠状动脉下位置植入的趋势使结果更加一致,但在技术细节和解剖尺寸方面仍存在令人困惑的意见分歧。三个相关瓣膜之间尺寸和形状不匹配的重要性很少受到关注。瓣膜的直径和受体主动脉瓣环的形状往往存在差异。当我们从主动脉同种异体移植手术过渡到肺动脉自体移植手术时,这种不确定性以及对关键技术细节的意见分歧令人不安,而且由于我们没有同种异体移植库,每次手术仅有一个同种异体移植物可用,这使情况更加复杂。
我们比较了各种几何不匹配情况下的血流动力学结果。所有手术细节相同,定期对患者进行研究。对受体主动脉瓣环与肺动脉自体移植不匹配的患者进行了比较。将三尖瓣主动脉瓣环正常的患者与具有圆形再次置换人工瓣膜瓣环或二叶式受体瓣环的患者进行了比较。第三,我们将主动脉瓣环折叠的患者与远端主动脉重塑的患者进行了比较。最后,我们比较了供体同种异体移植物与肺动脉自体移植之间的不匹配情况。
未发现三个瓣膜之间的几何不匹配对肺动脉自体移植手术的结果有影响。
如果遵循某些手术原则,无需经历痛苦的学习曲线即可获得良好结果。该手术不一定复杂,可以充分补偿三个相关瓣膜之间的几何不匹配。