Arreola M, Neiman H L, Sugarman A, Laurenti L, Forys R
Department of Radiology, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh 15224, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1997 Aug;10(3 Suppl 1):146-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168682.
Because of their typically small in-house computer and network staff, non-university hospitals often hesitate to consider picture archiving and communication system (PACS) as a solution to the very demanding financial, clinical, and technological needs of today's Radiology Department. This article presents the experiences of the 3-year process for the design and implementation of the Radiology Electronic Imaging Network (REIN) in the Department of Radiology at The Western Pennsylvania Hospital (WPH). WPH embarked on this project in late 1994 to find a solution to the very pressing demands to reduce operating costs and improve service to primary care clinicians, both on-site and at WPH-affiliated clinics. A five-member committee consisting of in-house medical, administrative, information services, and medical physics staff was formed to design a network that would satisfy specific needs of WPH by using a phased mini-PACS approach and to select the various vendors to implement it. Suppliers for individual mini-PACS were selected to provide modality-specific solutions. For the backbone network, vendors were evaluated based on their technological progress, competence and resources, the commitment of the company to the imaging network business, and their willingness to embark on a mid-sized PACS project such as this. Based on patient volume, workflow patterns, and image quality requirements, the committee produced proposals detailing number and location of workstations, short- and long-term memory requirements, and so on. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, computer radiography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, digital fluoroscopy, and angiography mini-PACS have been implemented over the past 2 years, and most of these are already integrated into the main REIN. This article presents detailed information concerning the design, selection and implementation processes, including storage requirement calculations. This indicates that PACS implementation is achievable for community hospitals with small computer, networking, and physics departments. Also presented are recommendations concerning design and vendor selection, that may be helpful for similar institutions.
由于内部计算机和网络技术人员通常较少,非大学附属医院往往不愿将图像存档与通信系统(PACS)视为满足当今放射科极为苛刻的财务、临床和技术需求的解决方案。本文介绍了在西宾夕法尼亚医院(WPH)放射科设计和实施放射科电子成像网络(REIN)的3年过程中的经验。WPH于1994年末启动了该项目,旨在找到解决方案,以应对降低运营成本以及改善对现场和WPH附属诊所的初级保健临床医生服务的紧迫需求。一个由内部医学、行政、信息服务和医学物理人员组成的五人委员会成立,负责设计一个通过分阶段小型PACS方法满足WPH特定需求的网络,并选择不同供应商来实施该网络。选择了各个小型PACS的供应商来提供特定模态的解决方案。对于骨干网络,根据供应商的技术进步、能力和资源、公司对成像网络业务的投入以及他们参与此类中型PACS项目的意愿来进行评估。根据患者数量、工作流程模式和图像质量要求,委员会提出了详细的提案,包括工作站数量和位置、短期和长期存储需求等。计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像、计算机放射摄影、超声、核医学、数字荧光透视和血管造影小型PACS在过去两年中已实施,其中大多数已集成到主要的REIN中。本文介绍了有关设计、选择和实施过程的详细信息,包括存储需求计算。这表明对于计算机、网络和物理部门规模较小的社区医院来说,实施PACS是可行的。还介绍了有关设计和供应商选择的建议,可能对类似机构有所帮助。