• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器官获取组织和移植中心对尸体肾移植结果的影响。

Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.

作者信息

Cho Y W, Cecka J M

出版信息

Clin Transpl. 1996:427-41.

PMID:9286586
Abstract
  1. A majority of transplant centers had significant improvements in cadaver donor kidney graft survival rates since 1991. A 10% or greater increase in one-year graft survival rates was reported by 36 of 128 large transplant centers. 2. When transplants were grouped according to the organ procurement agency that procured the kidney, large variations in one-year graft survival rates among 65 OPOs were noted. The "OPO effect" was of a magnitude similar to that of the "center effect" when analyzed separately. 3. Fourteen OPOs with the lowest graft survival rates procured a significantly higher fraction of kidneys from older, hypertensive or Black donors and donors whose deaths were not from motor vehicle accidents. Transplants were more often given to Black recipients, and kidneys were less frequently shared compared with 15 OPOs with the highest graft survival rates. 4. Significantly higher proportions of non-Black donors and recipients, patients with no activity limitation at the time of listing, patients working fulltime at the time of transplantation, and patients on dialysis less than one year were more frequently transplanted at 21 centers with excellent one-year graft survival rates compared with centers in groups with poorer results. 5. Increased numbers of mismatched HLA-B,DR antigens were detrimental to graft survival at centers with good or fair one-year graft survival rates, but had a minimal effect at centers with excellent results. 6. The OPO effect on graft survival rates was significantly associated with the center effect. Kidneys procured by OPOs associated with low graft survival rates and transplanted at centers with low graft survival rates resulted in the worst graft outcome. Interestingly, kidneys procured by OPOs associated with high graft survival rates, but transplanted by centers with low graft survival rates had better outcomes than kidneys from OPOs with lower graft survival rates. 7. Based on univariate analyses, the center and OPO effects ranked third and fifth among 16 significant factors. However, after adjusting for these 16 potentially confounding variables using a multivariate Cox regression model, the differences between the best and worst center and OPO groups were the fourth and eleventh most detrimental risk factors on graft outcome, respectively.
摘要
  1. 自1991年以来,大多数移植中心的尸体供肾移植存活率有显著提高。128家大型移植中心中有36家报告其一年期移植存活率提高了10%或更多。2. 当根据获取肾脏的器官获取机构对移植进行分组时,65个器官获取组织(OPO)的一年期移植存活率存在很大差异。单独分析时,“OPO效应”的程度与“中心效应”相似。3. 移植存活率最低的14个OPO从年龄较大、患有高血压或黑人供体以及死亡并非由机动车事故导致的供体中获取的肾脏比例显著更高。与移植存活率最高的15个OPO相比,这些OPO的移植手术更多是给黑人受者,且肾脏共享频率更低。4. 与结果较差组的中心相比,在21家一年期移植存活率优异的中心,非黑人供体和受者、登记时无活动受限的患者、移植时全职工作的患者以及透析时间少于一年的患者接受移植的比例显著更高。5. HLA - B、DR抗原错配数量增加对一年期移植存活率良好或中等的中心的移植存活不利,但对结果优异的中心影响最小。6. OPO对移植存活率的影响与中心效应显著相关。由移植存活率低的OPO获取并在移植存活率低的中心移植的肾脏,移植结果最差。有趣的是,由移植存活率高的OPO获取但由移植存活率低的中心移植的肾脏,其结果比来自移植存活率低的OPO的肾脏更好。7. 根据单变量分析,中心效应和OPO效应在16个显著因素中分别排名第三和第五。然而,在使用多变量Cox回归模型对这16个潜在混杂变量进行调整后,最佳和最差中心组以及OPO组之间的差异分别是对移植结果第四和第十一大有害风险因素。

相似文献

1
Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.器官获取组织和移植中心对尸体肾移植结果的影响。
Clin Transpl. 1996:427-41.
2
The UNOS scientific renal transplant registry. United Network for Organ Sharing.美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1995:1-18.
3
A multi-factor analysis of kidney graft outcomes at one and five years posttransplantation: 1996 UNOS Update.肾移植术后1年和5年移植肾结局的多因素分析:1996年器官共享联合网络更新版
Clin Transpl. 1996:343-60.
4
A multi-factor analysis of kidney regraft outcomes.肾脏再次移植结果的多因素分析。
Clin Transpl. 2002:335-49.
5
The LifeLink Foundation and cadaver kidney transplantation in Tampa.生命链接基金会与坦帕的尸体肾移植
Clin Transpl. 1999:149-58.
6
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 1999:1-21.
7
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--ten years of kidney transplants.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处——十年肾脏移植情况
Clin Transpl. 1997:1-14.
8
Kidney transplantation in the United States.美国的肾脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2008:1-18.
9
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处——1990年。
Clin Transpl. 1990:1-10.
10
The UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2002:1-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Accepting Kidneys of Varying Quality for Transplantation or Expedited Placement With Decision Trees.用决策树评估接受不同质量的肾脏进行移植或加急移植的情况。
Transplantation. 2019 May;103(5):980-989. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002585.
2
Geographic Variation in Cold Ischemia Time: Kidney vs. Liver Transplantation in the United States, 2003-2011.冷缺血时间的地理差异:2003 - 2011年美国肾脏移植与肝脏移植对比
Transplant Direct. 2015 Aug;1(7):e27. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000529. Epub 2015 Aug 13.