Alessi C A, Stuck A E, Aronow H U, Yuhas K E, Bula C J, Madison R, Gold M, Segal-Gidan F, Fanello R, Rubenstein L Z, Beck J C
University of California, Los Angeles Multicampus Program in Geriatrics and Gerontology, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Sep;45(9):1044-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05964.x.
To describe the process of care of a program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and to determine: (1) if there are major findings in all domains of CGA (medical, functional, mental health, and social/ environmental), (2) if there is a continued clinical yield when CGA is repeated annually, and (3) factors that affect patient adherence with recommendations from CGA.
Descriptive prospective study of subjects allocated to the intervention group of a 3-year randomized trial of preventive in-home CGA.
Homes of participants living in an urban setting.
Persons aged 75 years or older and living at home who received the intervention (N = 202 subjects, mean age 80.8 years, 70% female, 95% white, 64% living alone).
Annual in-home CGA and quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners for 3 years.
Detailed data were collected prospectively on clinical problems detected by CGA, and specific recommendations were made for these problems using an instrument developed explicitly for this project to study the CGA process. Subject adherence with these recommendations was also recorded.
Major problems were identified in all domains of CGA; the most common problems were medical. In the first year, 76.7% of subjects had at least one major problem identified that was either previously unknown or suboptimally treated. One-third of subjects had additional major problems identified during the second and third years. A constant number of therapeutic and preventive recommendations was made each year (11.5 per subject annually). Subject adherence varied by type of recommendation (ANOVA, F = 108.4, P < .001); adherence was better for referrals to a physician than for referrals to a non-physician professional or community service or for recommendations involving self-care activities (Scheffe's test, P < .001).
In these community-dwelling older people, there was a continued yield of problems identified and recommendations made when CGA was repeated annually for 3 years, supporting the practice of repeat CGA in older people in the community. Subject adherence with recommendations from CGA varied by type of recommendation, but further work is needed to determine additional factors that affect this adherence and to determine the association between the yield of CGA (i.e., problems identified, recommendations given and adherence with these recommendations) and important clinical outcomes.
描述居家综合老年评估(CGA)项目的护理过程,并确定:(1)CGA所有领域(医疗、功能、心理健康和社会/环境)是否有主要发现;(2)每年重复进行CGA时是否有持续的临床收益;(3)影响患者遵循CGA建议的因素。
对一项为期3年的预防性居家CGA随机试验干预组受试者进行描述性前瞻性研究。
居住在城市环境中的参与者家中。
75岁及以上居家且接受干预的人群(N = 202名受试者,平均年龄80.8岁,70%为女性,95%为白人,64%独居)。
每年进行一次居家CGA,并由老年护理执业医师每季度进行一次家访,为期3年。
前瞻性收集CGA检测到的临床问题的详细数据,并使用专门为此项目开发的工具针对这些问题提出具体建议,以研究CGA过程。还记录了受试者对这些建议的遵循情况。
在CGA的所有领域均发现了主要问题;最常见的问题是医疗问题。在第一年,76.7%的受试者至少有一个之前未知或治疗不充分的主要问题被识别出来。三分之一的受试者在第二年和第三年又发现了其他主要问题。每年提出的治疗和预防性建议数量恒定(每人每年11.5条)。受试者的遵循情况因建议类型而异(方差分析,F = 108.4,P <.001);转诊给医生的建议的遵循情况优于转诊给非医生专业人员或社区服务的建议,或涉及自我护理活动的建议(谢费检验,P <.001)。
在这些社区居住的老年人中,每年重复进行3年CGA时,持续发现问题并提出建议,支持在社区老年人中重复进行CGA的做法。受试者对CGA建议的遵循情况因建议类型而异,但需要进一步开展工作以确定影响这种遵循情况的其他因素,并确定CGA的收益(即发现的问题、给出的建议以及对这些建议的遵循情况)与重要临床结果之间的关联。