Graf C, Grob P J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1977 Oct 29;107(43):1534-7.
108 determinations of CEA plasma concentrations were ordered for diagnostic purposes by the medical staff of our clinic between January 1974 and April 1976. Its usefulness was retrospectively analyzed by comparing the initially suspected diagnosis serving as the rationale for CEA determination with the CEA plasma levels and the final diagnoses of the patients when leaving the hospital. Of 32 patients with proven malignancies of various types the CEA concentrations were normal in 10, slightly elevated (2.5-20.0 ng) in 15, and highly elevated in 7, all having metastatic tumors. However, in 35 of the remaining 67 tested individuals without detectable malignancies the CEA concentrations were also slightly elevated (2.5-20.0 ng); these patients either had acute infections (10 individuals), autoimmune disease disorders (1 individual), various other nonmalignant diseases (10 individuals), or were heavy smokers. In 98 of 108 patients CEA testing had been ordered either to confirm or to rule out a suspected malignancy. The results were most often of little help. Malignancies were found in 15 of 50 patients with elevated CEA, but also in 9 of 48 patients with normal values. In only 6 patients did the CEA results influence further diagnostic and/or therapeutic measures, which consequently did not always prove to be beneficial for the patient.
1974年1月至1976年4月期间,我们诊所的医务人员出于诊断目的,对108例患者进行了癌胚抗原(CEA)血浆浓度测定。通过将最初作为CEA测定依据的疑似诊断与CEA血浆水平以及患者出院时的最终诊断进行比较,对其有用性进行了回顾性分析。在32例确诊为各种类型恶性肿瘤的患者中,10例CEA浓度正常,15例轻度升高(2.5 - 20.0 ng),7例高度升高,均为转移性肿瘤。然而,在其余67例未检测到恶性肿瘤的受测个体中,有35例CEA浓度也轻度升高(2.5 - 20.0 ng);这些患者要么患有急性感染(10例)、自身免疫性疾病(1例)、各种其他非恶性疾病(10例),要么是重度吸烟者。在108例患者中,有98例进行CEA检测是为了确认或排除疑似恶性肿瘤。结果往往帮助不大。CEA升高的50例患者中有15例发现患有恶性肿瘤,但CEA值正常的48例患者中也有9例患有恶性肿瘤。只有6例患者的CEA结果影响了进一步的诊断和/或治疗措施,而这些措施最终并非总是对患者有益。