Rebbeck T R
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6021, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Sep;6(9):733-43.
The mu (GSTM1 and theta (GSTT1) members of the glutathione S-transferase multigene family are candidate cancer susceptibility genes because of their ability to regulate the conjugation of carcinogenic compounds to excretable hydrophilic metabolites. Deletion variants that are associated with a lack of enzyme function exist at both these loci. Individuals who are carriers of homozygous deletions in the GSTM1 of GSTT1 genes may have an impaired ability to metabolically eliminate carcinogenic compounds and may therefore be at increased cancer risk. Molecular epidemiological studies have provided three pieces of information about the relationship of GSTM1 and GSTT1 with cancer susceptibility. First, the frequencies of homozygous GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion carriers is very high (i.e., 20-50%) in most populations studied to date. Second, GSTM1 and, possibly, GSTT1 may be involved in the etiology of cancer at more than one site. Third, the risk conferred to individuals who carry homozygous deletions in GSTM1 and GSTT1 appears to be small in magnitude. (e.g., odds ration of < 2). However, the magnitude of risk is larger (e.g., odds ratio of 3-5) when interactions of GSTM1 of GSTT1 with other factors (e.g., cigarette smoking) are considered. These findings have implications for studies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility and for future applications of these biomarkers in cancer prevention of control strategies. First, molecular epidemiological studies should consider both the common frequency of deletion genotypes and the relatively low cancer risk these deletion genotypes may impart. For example, the common frequency of deletion variants may improve statistical power in some molecular epidemiological studies, but large samples may still be required to detect relatively small effect sizes or important interaction effects. Second, the fact that deletion genotypes are common implies that the proportion of cancer attributable to these variants may be large in the general population. However, these genotypes may be less suited for individual cancer risk assessment because of their relatively small contribution to the absolute risk of cancer.
谷胱甘肽S-转移酶多基因家族的μ(GSTM1)和θ(GSTT1)成员是候选癌症易感基因,因为它们能够调节致癌化合物与可排泄亲水性代谢物的结合。这两个基因座都存在与酶功能缺失相关的缺失变异。GSTT1基因GSTM1纯合缺失的携带者代谢消除致癌化合物的能力可能受损,因此癌症风险可能增加。分子流行病学研究提供了关于GSTM1和GSTT1与癌症易感性关系的三条信息。首先,在迄今为止研究的大多数人群中,GSTM1和GSTT1纯合缺失携带者的频率非常高(即20%-50%)。其次,GSTM1以及可能的GSTT1可能参与不止一个部位癌症的病因。第三,GSTM1和GSTT1纯合缺失个体的风险似乎较小(例如,优势比<2)。然而,当考虑GSTM1或GSTT1与其他因素(如吸烟)的相互作用时,风险程度更大(例如,优势比为3-5)。这些发现对GSTM1和GSTT1在癌症易感性研究中的应用以及这些生物标志物在癌症预防控制策略中的未来应用具有启示意义。首先,分子流行病学研究应考虑缺失基因型的常见频率以及这些缺失基因型可能带来的相对较低的癌症风险。例如,缺失变异的常见频率可能会提高某些分子流行病学研究的统计效力,但可能仍需要大样本才能检测到相对较小效应量或重要的相互作用效应。其次,缺失基因型常见这一事实意味着在一般人群中,这些变异导致的癌症比例可能很大。然而,由于这些基因型对癌症绝对风险的贡献相对较小,它们可能不太适合个体癌症风险评估。