Perng R P, Wu M F, Lin S Y, Chen Y M, Lin J Y, Whang-Peng J
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Anticancer Drugs. 1997 Jul;8(6):565-73. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199707000-00003.
To evaluate the feasibility and pharmacology of intrapleural (IP(L)) administration of paclitaxel, 18 patients with malignant pleural effusions were entered onto a phase I clinical study, 13 were caused by lung cancer. Following an effusion drainage rate of less than 100 ml/24 h and full expansion of the lung, patients were treated with a single instillation of pacilitaxel administered IP(L) in 500 ml of normal saline and retained for a maximum of 96h when tolerated. No systemic chemotherapy or ipsilateral thoracic irradiation was given for 4 weeks before and after the IP(L) treatment. The starting dose was 82.5 mg/m2 with the dose escalation schedule of 125, 175, 225 and 300 mg/m2. There were minimal local or systemic toxicities, such as local chest pain or myelosuppression, even when the paclitaxel dose reached 225 mg/m2. The pharmacological advantages of the IP(L) administration of paclitaxel were demonstrated by the mean exposure of the pleural cavity (area under the concentration time curve) to paclitaxel after IP(L) delivery exceeding that of the plasma by approximately 370-fold (range 55-684) and by the extraordinarily slow IP(L) clearance of paclitaxel (mean +/- SE 0.49 +/- 0.07 l/m2/day; range 0.08-1.16 l/m2/day) with significant concentrations of paclitaxel persisting within the cavity for more than 48-96 h after a single IP(L) instillation. In patients with detectable plasma paclitaxel levels, the plasma levels achieved exceed the minimal concentrations that are required to induce cytotoxic effects in vitro. Four patients had progressive dyspnea during IP(L) retention of paclitaxel solution because of treatment failure and needed drainage of effusion. One of these patients who was at the dose level of 225 mg/m2 originally had severely chronic obstructive lung disease, developed acute respiratory failure, refused mechanical ventilation support and succumbed to respiratory failure. No further patients were included after this event. Antitumor effect was shown by four of the 15 evaluable patients having no recurrence of effusion on chest radiograph at 1 month. Most of these responders had a good performance status, normal pretreatment pleural pH and/or glucose compared with the non-responders. We conclude that paclitaxel at a dose level of 175 or 225 mg/m2 is feasible for use intrapleurally. It could be considered for incorporation into treatment programs for patients with less advanced thoracic tumors with carcinomatous pleuritis or with IP(L) tumors following surgical debulking.
为评估紫杉醇胸膜内(IP(L))给药的可行性和药理学特性,18例恶性胸腔积液患者进入一项I期临床研究,其中13例由肺癌引起。在胸腔积液引流量低于100 ml/24小时且肺完全复张后,患者接受一次IP(L)注射紫杉醇治疗,将其溶于500 ml生理盐水中,在耐受的情况下最多保留96小时。在IP(L)治疗前后4周内未进行全身化疗或同侧胸部放疗。起始剂量为82.5 mg/m²,剂量递增方案为125、175、225和300 mg/m²。即使紫杉醇剂量达到225 mg/m²,局部或全身毒性也极小,如局部胸痛或骨髓抑制。IP(L)注射紫杉醇的药理学优势表现为:IP(L)给药后胸腔对紫杉醇的平均暴露量(浓度-时间曲线下面积)超过血浆约370倍(范围55 - 684),且紫杉醇从IP(L)清除极其缓慢(平均±标准差0.49±0.07 l/m²/天;范围0.08 - 1.16 l/m²/天),单次IP(L)注射后,腔内紫杉醇浓度在48 - 96小时内仍显著持续存在。在血浆中可检测到紫杉醇水平的患者中,所达到的血浆水平超过了体外诱导细胞毒性作用所需的最低浓度。4例患者在IP(L)保留紫杉醇溶液期间因治疗失败出现进行性呼吸困难,需要引流胸腔积液。其中1例最初处于225 mg/m²剂量水平的患者患有严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病,发生急性呼吸衰竭,拒绝机械通气支持,最终死于呼吸衰竭。此事件后未再纳入更多患者。15例可评估患者中有4例在1个月时胸部X线片显示胸腔积液无复发,显示出抗肿瘤效果。与无反应者相比,这些有反应者大多一般状况良好,治疗前胸膜pH值和/或葡萄糖水平正常。我们得出结论,175或225 mg/m²剂量水平的紫杉醇用于胸膜内给药是可行的。对于病情不太严重的胸膜癌性胸膜炎胸壁肿瘤患者或手术减瘤后的IP(L)肿瘤患者,可考虑将其纳入治疗方案。