Suppr超能文献

丙型肝炎的治疗:α-干扰素n1试验

Therapy of hepatitis C: interferon alfa-n1 trials.

作者信息

Farrell G C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1997 Sep;26(3 Suppl 1):96S-100S. doi: 10.1002/hep.510260717.

Abstract

Interferon alfa-n1 is produced from a lymphoid cell line and consists of multiple alpha interferon subtypes. Early studies indicated that interferon alfa-n1 was effective against hepatitis C, and a meta-analysis of published trials indicated that it was equally likely as recombinant alpha interferons to produce an end-of-treatment biochemical and histological response. However, there appeared to be a lower rate of posttreatment relapse after a 6-month course of interferon alfa-n1, so that the sustained response rate was 25% compared with 16% for recombinant alpha interferons. Subsequently, the efficacy of interferon alfa-n1 has been compared with recombinant alpha interferon directly in two large multicenter studies. The 096 International Hepatitis Comparative Study compared alfa-n1 with interferon alfa-2b in doses of 3 million units (MU) three times weekly for 24 weeks in a total of 1,071 patients. Biochemical end-of-treatment response rates were similar (35% for alfa-n1; 38% for alfa-2b), as were virological and histological responses. Relapse occurred more frequently after interferon alfa-2b, so that sustained biochemical (10.3% vs. 6.7%) and virological responses at 12 months were higher for alfa-n1. In a second study from Italy, interferon alfa-n1 was compared with interferon alfa-2a, using higher doses (6 MU three times weekly) until a biochemical response was obtained, and then using 3 MU three times weekly for a total of 12 months. The combined biochemical and virological sustained response rates were higher than reported with 6 months of treatment and were similar for alfa-n1 (17%) as for alfa-2a (16%). The superiority of 12 versus 6 months of treatment was also confirmed in the large multicenter 091 European Comparative Treatment Schedules study of 440 patients given four different regimens of therapy. Sustained biochemical response rates were 6% in patients who received 3 MU three times weekly for 6 months and 19% in those who received this dose for 12 months. When given for 12 months, there was no advantage to a slightly higher dose of interferon alfa-n1 (5 MU three times weekly). Thus, therapy with interferon alfa-n1 produces sustained response rates equivalent to the best obtained with recombinant alpha interferon. The optimal treatment regimen appears to be 3 MU given three times weekly for 12 months.

摘要

干扰素α-n1由一种淋巴样细胞系产生,由多种α干扰素亚型组成。早期研究表明,干扰素α-n1对丙型肝炎有效,一项对已发表试验的荟萃分析表明,它产生治疗结束时生化和组织学反应的可能性与重组α干扰素相同。然而,在接受6个月疗程的干扰素α-n1治疗后,治疗后复发率似乎较低,因此持续反应率为25%,而重组α干扰素为16%。随后,在两项大型多中心研究中直接比较了干扰素α-n1与重组α干扰素的疗效。096国际肝炎比较研究在总共1071例患者中,将α-n1与300万单位(MU)剂量的干扰素α-2b每周3次、共24周进行比较。治疗结束时的生化反应率相似(α-n1为35%;α-2b为38%),病毒学和组织学反应也相似。干扰素α-2b治疗后复发更频繁,因此α-n1在12个月时的持续生化反应(10.3%对6.7%)和病毒学反应更高。在意大利的第二项研究中,将干扰素α-n1与干扰素α-2a进行比较,使用更高剂量(每周3次,每次6MU)直至获得生化反应,然后每周3次,每次3MU,共12个月。生化和病毒学联合持续反应率高于报道的6个月治疗率,α-n1(17%)与α-2a(16%)相似。在对440例患者给予四种不同治疗方案的大型多中心091欧洲比较治疗方案研究中,也证实了12个月治疗优于6个月治疗。接受每周3次、每次3MU、共6个月治疗的患者持续生化反应率为6%,接受该剂量12个月的患者为19%。当给予12个月治疗时,稍高剂量的干扰素α-n1(每周3次,每次5MU)并无优势。因此,干扰素α-n1治疗产生的持续反应率与重组α干扰素所能获得的最佳反应率相当。最佳治疗方案似乎是每周3次,每次3MU,共12个月。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验