• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

程序性和陈述性记忆任务的基线表现及学习率:年轻人与老年人的比较

Baseline performance and learning rate of procedural and declarative memory tasks: younger versus older adults.

作者信息

Vakil E, Agmon-Ashkenazi D

机构信息

Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Sep;52(5):P229-34. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p229.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p229
PMID:9310091
Abstract

Twenty-five older and 25 younger adults were compared on declarative (i.e., Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test and Visual Pair Associations) and procedural (i.e., Tower of Hanoi puzzle and Porteus mazes) learning tasks. A dissociation between learning rate on declarative and procedural tasks was demonstrated for the elderly participants. The younger group showed a steeper learning rate than the older group on the declarative tasks. By contrast, the learning rate of both groups on the procedural tasks did not differ consistently, whether the measure was number of errors/moves or time elapsed (with one exception in which the older group showed a steeper learning rate than the younger group). The younger group's baseline performance was better than that of the older group on all tasks employed in this study. These results reinforce the importance of distinguishing between baseline performance and the rate of learning on procedural learning tasks.

摘要

对25名老年人和25名年轻人进行了陈述性学习任务(即雷伊听觉词语学习测验和视觉配对联想测验)和程序性学习任务(即河内塔谜题和波特斯迷宫)的比较。结果表明,老年参与者在陈述性任务和程序性任务上的学习速度存在分离。在陈述性任务中,年轻组的学习速度比老年组更快。相比之下,无论测量指标是错误/移动次数还是所用时间,两组在程序性任务上的学习速度并无一致差异(仅有一个例外,即老年组的学习速度比年轻组更快)。在本研究采用的所有任务中,年轻组的基线表现均优于老年组。这些结果强化了区分程序性学习任务中基线表现和学习速度的重要性。

相似文献

1
Baseline performance and learning rate of procedural and declarative memory tasks: younger versus older adults.程序性和陈述性记忆任务的基线表现及学习率:年轻人与老年人的比较
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Sep;52(5):P229-34. doi: 10.1093/geronb/52b.5.p229.
2
Differential effect of right and left basal ganglionic infarctions on procedural learning.
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004 Jun;17(2):62-73. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000094553.44085.25.
3
Sequences assessed by declarative and procedural tests of memory in amnesic patients with hippocampal damage.通过对海马体损伤的失忆症患者进行陈述性和程序性记忆测试来评估的序列。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(14):1877-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.008.
4
Declarative and procedural learning in Parkinson's disease patients having tremor or bradykinesia as the predominant symptom.以震颤或运动迟缓为主要症状的帕金森病患者的陈述性和程序性学习。
Cortex. 1998 Sep;34(4):611-20. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70518-5.
5
Procedural and declarative memory in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中的程序性记忆和陈述性记忆。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Sep;10(5):647-54. doi: 10.1017/S1355617704105018.
6
Declarative and procedural learning in individuals with subclinical obsessive-compulsive symptoms.有亚临床强迫症症状个体的陈述性学习和程序性学习
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Sep;25(6):830-41. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.6.830.16477.
7
Selective Procedural Memory Impairment but Preserved Declarative Memory in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.脊髓小脑性共济失调 3 型患者选择性程序性记忆损伤但陈述性记忆完好。
Cerebellum. 2020 Apr;19(2):226-234. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01101-w.
8
Youthful Brains in Older Adults: Preserved Neuroanatomy in the Default Mode and Salience Networks Contributes to Youthful Memory in Superaging.老年人的年轻大脑:默认模式网络和突显网络中保留的神经解剖结构有助于超老龄化人群保持年轻的记忆力。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 14;36(37):9659-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1492-16.2016.
9
[Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].[注意力对精神分裂症患者听觉言语学习测试的影响]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):291-7.
10
The effect of presentation level on memory performance.呈现水平对记忆表现的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):524-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820a0281.

引用本文的文献

1
Research outside the laboratory: Longitudinal at-home neurostimulation.实验室外研究:在家进行纵向神经刺激。
Behav Brain Res. 2022 Jun 25;428:113894. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113894. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
Acquisition of Motor and Cognitive Skills through Repetition in Typically Developing Children.正常发育儿童通过重复习得运动和认知技能。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158684. eCollection 2016.
3
Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.视力不会调节高级认知任务的效应量。
Exp Aging Res. 2016;42(3):221-63. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2016.1156964.
4
Characterizing cognitive aging of spatial and contextual memory in animal models.在动物模型中表征空间和情境记忆的认知老化
Front Aging Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;4:12. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00012. eCollection 2012.
5
Synergistic effects of age and stress in a rodent model of stroke.年龄和应激在卒中啮齿动物模型中的协同作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 6;214(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.035. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
6
Episodic memory deficits slow down the dynamics of cognitive procedural learning in normal ageing.情景记忆缺陷会减缓正常衰老过程中认知程序学习的动态变化。
Memory. 2009 Feb;17(2):197-207. doi: 10.1080/09658210802212010.
7
Age-related changes in the cerebral substrates of cognitive procedural learning.认知程序性学习的大脑基质中与年龄相关的变化。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Apr;30(4):1374-86. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20605.
8
Habit and skill learning in schizophrenia: evidence of normal striatal processing with abnormal cortical input.精神分裂症中的习惯与技能学习:纹状体处理正常但皮质输入异常的证据。
Learn Mem. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(6):430-42. doi: 10.1101/lm.49102.