Drew P J, Hughes M, Hodson R, Farouk R, Lee P W, Wedgwood K R, Monson J R, Duthie G S
University of Hull Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, UK.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997 Aug;23(4):315-6. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(97)90723-x.
With the proposed introduction of a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening programme for colorectal cancer, patient compliance is of paramount importance. Therefore, the bowel preparation providing optimum cleansing of the bowel with the least associated discomfort and inconvenience for the patient must be found. Patients were randomized to receive either Picolax the evening before the examination or self-administered Fleet enemas prior to the investigation. The endoscopist and nurse practitioner who collected data on a standard questionnaire were blinded to the preparation used. Bowel preparation was graded by the endoscopist as: excellent, good, adequate or poor. One hundred and two consecutive patients were randomized: 56 to the Fleet enema group and 46 to the Picolax group. Self-administered Fleet enemas provided a significantly superior bowel preparation with 52 (93%) being judged adequate or better, as opposed to 34 (74%) in the Picolax group. In addition, Fleet enemas were associated with significantly fewer adverse associated symptoms: 11 (20%) vs 24 (52%). Patients reported to be willing to receive Fleet enemas again in 53 (95%) vs 37 (80%) for the Picolax group. The self-administered Fleet enema is superior to Picolax in terms of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy and the incidence of associated adverse symptoms.
随着拟议引入针对结直肠癌的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查计划,患者的依从性至关重要。因此,必须找到一种能在给患者带来最少相关不适和不便的情况下实现肠道最佳清洁的肠道准备方法。患者被随机分为两组,一组在检查前一晚服用聚乙二醇电解质散,另一组在检查前自行使用灌肠剂。收集标准问卷数据的内镜医师和执业护士对所使用的肠道准备方法不知情。内镜医师将肠道准备情况分为:优秀、良好、足够或差。连续102例患者被随机分组:56例进入灌肠剂组,46例进入聚乙二醇电解质散组。自行使用灌肠剂的肠道准备效果明显更好,52例(93%)被判定为足够或更好,而聚乙二醇电解质散组为34例(74%)。此外,灌肠剂相关的不良症状明显更少:分别为11例(20%)和24例(52%)。据报告,愿意再次接受灌肠剂的患者,灌肠剂组有53例(95%),聚乙二醇电解质散组有37例(80%)。就柔性乙状结肠镜检查的肠道准备及相关不良症状的发生率而言,自行使用灌肠剂优于聚乙二醇电解质散。