Suppr超能文献

胸腹主动脉瘤修复术:采用钳夹缝合技术十年回顾

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: perspectives over a decade with the clamp-and-sew technique.

作者信息

Cambria R P, Davison J K, Zannetti S, L'Italien G, Atamian S

机构信息

The Division of Vascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):294-303; discussion 303-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Experience over a decade with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA) repair using a clamp-sew technique was reviewed to compare overall results with alternative operative methods.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Controversy continues as to the optimal technique for TAA repair, with frequent contemporary emphasis on bypass-distal perfusion methods. Proponents of this technique claim improved results compared to those of historic control subjects in the parameters of operative mortality, postoperative renal failure, and lower extremity neurologic deficit.

METHODS

Over the interval from 1987 to 1996, 160 TAA repairs (type I, 32%; type II, 15%; type III, 34%; and type IV, 19%) were performed in 157 patients with a mean age of 70 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1/1. Clinical features included ruptured TAA (10%), urgent operation (22.5%), and aortic dissection (18%). Operative management used a clamp-sew technique with regional hypothermia for spinal cord (epidural cooling, since 1993) and renal protection. Variables associated with the endpoints of operative mortality or major morbidity, particularly spinal cord injury, were assessed with Fisher exact test and logistic regression; late survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 9% and was associated with operation for rupture (p < 0.005) or other acute presentation (p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, the postoperative complication renal failure (relative risk, 6.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-23.6, p = 0.004]) and significant spinal cord injury (relative risk, 16.5 [95% confidence interval, 3.2-83.2, p = 0.001]) were associated independently with operative mortality. Paraparesis-paraplegia occurred in 7%, an incidence significantly (p < 0.001) less than that (18.7%) predicted for this cohort from published models. Variables associated (univariate analysis) with this complication included TAA rupture (p < 0.0001), other acute presentation or dissection (p < 0.001), prolonged (>6 hours) operation (p < 0.04), and excessive (>3 L) transfusions (p < 0.02). Operation for acute presentation or dissection (relative risk, 7.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.7-37.7, p = 0.009]) and prolonged surgery [relative risk, 7.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-35.3, p = 0.01]) retained independent association with paraplegia-paraparesis after multivariate analysis. Dialysis was needed in 2.5%. Late survival at 1 and 5 years was 86 +/- 2.9% and 62 +/- 5.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data compare favorably with those from contemporary reports using other operative strategies and do not support routine adoption of bypass-distal perfusion as the preferred technique for TAA repair.

摘要

目的

回顾采用钳夹缝合技术修复胸腹主动脉瘤(TAA)超过十年的经验,以将总体结果与其他手术方法进行比较。

总结背景数据

关于TAA修复的最佳技术仍存在争议,目前经常强调旁路 - 远端灌注方法。该技术的支持者声称,与历史对照对象相比,在手术死亡率、术后肾衰竭和下肢神经功能缺损等参数方面结果有所改善。

方法

在1987年至1996年期间,对157例患者进行了160例TAA修复手术(I型,32%;II型,15%;III型,34%;IV型,19%),患者平均年龄70岁,男女比例为1/1。临床特征包括破裂性TAA(10%)、急诊手术(22.5%)和主动脉夹层(18%)。手术管理采用钳夹缝合技术,并对脊髓进行局部低温(自1993年起采用硬膜外冷却)和肾脏保护。使用Fisher精确检验和逻辑回归评估与手术死亡率或主要并发症终点相关的变量,特别是脊髓损伤;采用Kaplan - Meier方法估计晚期生存率。

结果

住院死亡率为9%,与破裂手术(p < 0.005)或其他急性表现(p < 0.001)相关。多因素分析后,术后并发症肾衰竭(相对风险,6.5 [95%置信区间,1.8 - 23.6,p = 0.004])和严重脊髓损伤(相对风险,16.5 [95%置信区间,3.2 - 83.2,p = 0.001])与手术死亡率独立相关。截瘫 - 四肢瘫发生率为7%,该发生率显著低于(p < 0.001)根据已发表模型预测的该队列发生率(18.7%)。与该并发症相关的变量(单因素分析)包括TAA破裂(p < 0.0001)、其他急性表现或夹层(p < 0.001)、手术时间延长(>6小时)(p < 0.04)和输血过多(>3L)(p < 0.02)。急性表现或夹层手术(相对风险,7.9 [95%置信区间,1.7 - 37.7,p = 0.009])和手术时间延长[相对风险,7.5 [95%置信区间,1.5 - 35.3,p = 0.01])在多因素分析后与截瘫 - 四肢瘫仍保持独立相关性。2.5%的患者需要透析。1年和5年的晚期生存率分别为86±2.9%和62±5.8%。

结论

这些数据与使用其他手术策略的当代报告数据相比具有优势,不支持常规采用旁路 - 远端灌注作为TAA修复的首选技术。

相似文献

4
Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: a 20-year perspective.胸腹主动脉瘤修复术:20年回顾
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S856-61; discussion S890-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.096.
6
Evolution of operative strategies in open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.开放胸腹主动脉瘤修复术中手术策略的演变。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1195-1201.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.055. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
8
Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective cohort study of 121 cases.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep;16(5):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0181-x. Epub 2002 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Improvement in results of repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Jul;24(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70147-7.
5
Is clamp and sew still viable for thoracic aortic resection?对于胸主动脉切除术,钳夹并缝合仍然可行吗?
Ann Surg. 1996 May;223(5):534-40; discussion 540-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199605000-00009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验