Suppr超能文献

医学院学术院长对课程内容的看法。

Academic deans' views on curriculum content in medical schools.

作者信息

Graber D R, Bellack J P, Musham C, O'Neil E H

机构信息

Department of Health Administration and Policy, Medical University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Charleston 29425, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10):901-7.

PMID:9347713
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine which of 33 topics academic deans identify as worthy of greater emphasis in medical curricula. Also, to assess the barriers to needed curricular changes.

METHOD

In March 1996 a questionnaire was developed and mailed to the academic deans of all U.S. schools affiliated with the Association of American Medical Colleges (n = 126) and all schools associated with the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathy (n = 17). There were 46 questions in a five-point Likert-type format (1 = not at all, 5 = to a great extent) and one open-ended question. The deans were queried as to what extent each of 33 topics (1) was included in medical students' required learning experiences (current emphasis) and (2) should be included in medical students' required learning experiences (ideal emphasis). The deans were also asked to what extent they believed 12 different factors would be barriers to needed curriculum changes in their programs. Primary data analysis focused on simple comparisons of response means and frequencies.

RESULTS

Two separate mailings resulted in the return of 100 questionnaires (70%): 85 from the allopathic schools (67%) and 15 from the osteopathic schools (88%). "Effective patient-provider relationships/communication," "outpatient/ambulatory care," and "health promotion/disease prevention" had the three highest mean ratings for ideal emphasis by the allopathic school deans. "Primary care," "professional values," and "use of electronic information systems" also had high mean rankings for ideal emphasis. "Primary care," "outpatient/ambulatory care," and "health promotion/disease prevention" had the three highest mean ratings for ideal emphasis by the osteopathic school deans.

CONCLUSION

Changes in health care delivery and an increasing generalist orientation are influencing academic deans' perspectives on needed curriculum changes, and there appears to be considerable support for medical school curricula that will foster a broader, more humanistic role for physicians.

摘要

目的

确定33个主题中哪些是学术院长认为在医学课程中值得更多强调的。同时,评估所需课程改革的障碍。

方法

1996年3月编制了一份问卷,并邮寄给美国医学院协会附属的所有美国学校(n = 126)以及与美国骨病医学院协会相关的所有学校(n = 17)的学术院长。问卷有46个五点李克特式格式的问题(1 = 完全不,5 = 很大程度)和一个开放式问题。院长们被问及33个主题中的每一个在多大程度上(1)包含在医学生的必修学习经历中(当前重点)以及(2)应该包含在医学生的必修学习经历中(理想重点)。院长们还被问及他们认为12个不同因素在多大程度上会成为他们所在项目所需课程改革的障碍。主要数据分析集中在对回答均值和频率的简单比较上。

结果

两次单独邮寄共收回100份问卷(70%):85份来自全科医学院校(67%),15份来自骨病医学院校(88%)。“有效的医患关系/沟通”“门诊/非卧床护理”和“健康促进/疾病预防”在全科医学院校院长对理想重点的平均评分中位列前三。“初级保健”“职业价值观”和“电子信息系统的使用”在理想重点方面也有较高的平均排名。“初级保健”“门诊/非卧床护理”和“健康促进/疾病预防”在骨病医学院校院长对理想重点的平均评分中位列前三。

结论

医疗服务的变化和日益增长的通科医生导向正在影响学术院长对所需课程改革的看法,并且似乎有相当多的人支持能够培养医生更广泛、更具人文精神角色的医学院课程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验