Möhrke W, Knauf H, Mutschler E
Medical Department, Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals-Germany GmbH, Weiterstadt, Germany.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Oct;35(10):447-52.
Although triamterene has been in clinical use for over 30 years, the linearity of triamterene kinetics was not systematically tested. Moreover, although triamterene is mostly applied concomitantly with thiazide-type diuretics the interaction of triamterene (TA) with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) is subject to a controversial discussion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the dose linearity of TA and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide. In the first study 10 healthy volunteers received 0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 mg triamterene orally in a balanced crossover design. In the second study 0, 25, and 50 mg TA with 12.5, and 25 mg HCT, respectively, were administered to 12 healthy volunteers. Urine volume and concentration of sodium, TA, hydroxytriamterene sulfate (OH-TA ester), and HCT were measured by flame photometry and thin-layer chromatography, respectively. The observation period for each treatment was 3 days and the drug was given on the second day. Sodium excretion was increased by both drugs. Renal excretion of both TA and OH-TA ester seemed to be reduced at higher doses. However, statistical evaluation revealed no significant (p = 0.37, and p = 0.20, respectively) deviation from linearity. Renal excretion of HCT was not affected by TA and vice versa. However, renal excretion of OH-TA ester is significantly reduced when HCT is administered concomitantly. The renal excretion rate of sodium can be described by a common Emax model when the effects of the excretion rates of both TA and HCT are additive. It is concluded that the pharmacokinetics of TA is linear within the tested dose range and that pharmacodynamic additivity of HCT and TA is not due to a pharmacokinetic interaction. The results support the hypothesis of a sequential nephron blockade for both drugs acting on different tubular segments.
尽管氨苯蝶啶已临床应用30多年,但氨苯蝶啶动力学的线性并未得到系统测试。此外,尽管氨苯蝶啶大多与噻嗪类利尿剂联合应用,但氨苯蝶啶(TA)与氢氯噻嗪(HCT)之间的相互作用仍存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是考察TA的剂量线性以及氨苯蝶啶与氢氯噻嗪的药代动力学和药效学相互作用。在第一项研究中,10名健康志愿者按照平衡交叉设计口服0、12.5、25、50和100mg氨苯蝶啶。在第二项研究中,分别向12名健康志愿者给予0、25和50mg TA以及12.5和25mg HCT。尿体积以及钠、TA、硫酸氢氨苯蝶啶(OH-TA酯)和HCT的浓度分别通过火焰光度法和薄层色谱法测定。每种治疗的观察期为3天,药物在第二天给予。两种药物均使钠排泄增加。较高剂量时,TA和OH-TA酯的肾排泄似乎均减少。然而,统计评估显示与线性无显著(分别为p = 0.37和p = 0.20)偏差。TA不影响HCT的肾排泄,反之亦然。然而,同时给予HCT时,OH-TA酯的肾排泄显著减少。当TA和HCT排泄率的作用相加时,钠的肾排泄率可用共同的Emax模型描述。得出结论,在测试剂量范围内TA的药代动力学呈线性,HCT和TA的药效学相加并非由于药代动力学相互作用。结果支持两种药物作用于不同肾小管节段的顺序性肾单位阻断假说。