Stevenson W G, Ellison K E, Lefroy D C, Friedman P L
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Oct 23;80(8A):56G-66G. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00714-5.
Ablation has become an important and, in some cases, the first-line therapy for a number of tachyarrhythmias. The feasibility of treating arrhythmias with ablation was initially demonstrated with surgical ablation techniques. Recently, catheter ablation techniques have replaced the surgical approach in nearly all cases. Catheter ablation is highly effective for the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, atrioventricular nodal reentry, and atrial ectopic tachycardia. It is effective for atrial flutter, although approximately one quarter of patients treated with catheter ablation continue to require therapy for concomitant atrial fibrillation. The surgical maze procedure has proved to be feasible for preventing atrial fibrillation. The risks and long-term efficacy of catheter ablation maze procedures for atrial fibrillation need to be defined. The efficacy of ablation for ventricular tachycardia varies with the type of tachycardia. Catheter ablation is very effective for the rare idiopathic ventricular tachycardias that occur in structurally normal hearts and for bundle-branch reentry ventricular tachycardia, which occurs most frequently in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. When performed at an experienced center, surgical ablation is an excellent option for selected patients with ventricular tachycardia due to prior myocardial infarction who have a discrete aneurysm but otherwise well-preserved ventricular function. Catheter ablation shows promise for this arrhythmia, but it can be offered only to those patients who have relatively slow tachycardias that allow catheter mapping. Substantial advances in mapping and ablation technology will continue to occur, allowing nonpharmacologic control of cardiac arrhythmias to be achieved in an ever greater number of patients.
消融术已成为多种快速性心律失常的重要治疗方法,在某些情况下甚至是一线治疗方法。最初通过手术消融技术证明了用消融术治疗心律失常的可行性。最近,在几乎所有情况下,导管消融技术已取代了手术方法。导管消融术对预激综合征、房室结折返性心动过速和房性异位性心动过速非常有效。对心房扑动也有效,尽管约四分之一接受导管消融术治疗的患者仍需要针对合并的心房颤动进行治疗。手术迷宫术已被证明对预防心房颤动是可行的。导管消融迷宫术治疗心房颤动的风险和长期疗效尚需明确。消融术治疗室性心动过速的疗效因心动过速类型而异。导管消融术对发生于结构正常心脏的罕见特发性室性心动过速以及最常见于扩张型心肌病患者的束支折返性室性心动过速非常有效。在经验丰富的中心进行手术时,对于因既往心肌梗死而患有局限性室壁瘤但心室功能保存良好的特定室性心动过速患者,手术消融是一个很好的选择。导管消融术对这种心律失常显示出前景,但仅适用于那些心动过速相对较慢、允许进行导管标测的患者。标测和消融技术将继续取得重大进展,使越来越多的患者能够实现心律失常的非药物控制。