Suppr超能文献

将乙型肝炎核心抗原抗体筛查献血者作为检测1型人类免疫缺陷病毒窗口期感染的一种方法的价值和成本效益。HIV献血者研究组。

Value and cost-effectiveness of screening blood donors for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen as a way of detecting window-phase human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infections. The HIV Blood Donor Study Group.

作者信息

Busch M P, Dodd R Y, Lackritz E M, AuBuchon J P, Birkmeyer J D, Petersen L R

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1997 Oct;37(10):1003-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.371098016437.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of screening donors for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) for the prevention of posttransfusion hepatitis has declined markedly. However, anti-HBc screening may still be useful as a surrogate marker for the window period (WP) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

First, the relationship between anti-HBc reactivity and HIV-1 WP infections was examined among 225 donors who had seroconverted to anti-HIV-1 positivity between 1987 and 1990. In addition, data from 1654 HIV-1 seropositive donors were analyzed to characterize the relationship among anti-HBc reactivity, donor demographics, and HIV-1-related risk factors. The yield and cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc for HIV-1 prevention were then projected on the basis of a published decision analysis model.

RESULTS

Forty (18%) of 225 HIV-1-seroconverting donors tested anti-HBc-reactive on the donation preceding anti-HIV-1 seroconversion; in contrast, 341 (34%) of 1014 HIV-1-seropositive donors interviewed tested anti-HBc-reactive (chi-square test; p < 0.001). Anti-HBc reactivity was more common among HIV-1-seropositive donors reporting male-to-male sexual contact (169/360, 47%) and injection drug use (44/83, 53%) than among those with heterosexual contacts known to be HIV-1-positive (31/190, 16%) or transfusion exposure (3/21, 14%) or among females with no identified risk factors (21/124, 17%). The estimates of 18 to 34 percent sensitivity for anti-HBc in detecting HIV-1 WP donations and a current rate of 1 in 676,000 HIV-1 WP donations (after p24 antigen screening) suggest that continued use of anti-HBc screening could result in the transfusion of 5 to 12 fewer HIV-1-infected units per year in the United States, which would add 19 to 48 quality-adjusted years of life for the 3.5 million annual transfusion recipients at a cost of $992,020 to $2,345,000 per quality-adjusted life-year saved.

CONCLUSION

The low yield and very poor cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc screening indicate that this test is not an effective screening test for HIV-1 WP donations.

摘要

背景

筛查献血者的乙肝核心抗原抗体(抗-HBc)以预防输血后肝炎的价值已显著下降。然而,抗-HBc筛查作为人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染窗口期(WP)的替代标志物可能仍有用处。

研究设计与方法

首先,在1987年至1990年间血清转化为抗-HIV-1阳性的225名献血者中,研究抗-HBc反应性与HIV-1窗口期感染之间的关系。此外,分析了1654名HIV-1血清阳性献血者的数据,以描述抗-HBc反应性、献血者人口统计学特征和HIV-1相关危险因素之间的关系。然后根据已发表的决策分析模型预测抗-HBc用于预防HIV-1的检出率和成本效益。

结果

225名HIV-1血清转化的献血者中有40名(18%)在抗-HIV-1血清转化前的献血检测中抗-HBc呈反应性;相比之下,在接受访谈的1014名HIV-1血清阳性献血者中有341名(34%)抗-HBc呈反应性(卡方检验;p<0.001)。在报告有男男性接触(169/360,47%)和注射吸毒(44/83,53%)的HIV-1血清阳性献血者中,抗-HBc反应性比已知为HIV-1阳性的异性接触者(31/190,16%)、输血暴露者(3/21,14%)或无明确危险因素的女性(21/124,17%)更为常见。抗-HBc检测HIV-1窗口期献血的敏感性估计为18%至34%,目前HIV-1窗口期献血率为676,000分之一(在p24抗原筛查后),这表明继续使用抗-HBc筛查可能会使美国每年少输注5至12个感染HIV-1的单位,这将为每年350万输血受者增加19至48个质量调整生命年,每个质量调整生命年节省的成本为992,020美元至2,345,000美元。

结论

抗-HBc筛查的检出率低且成本效益很差,表明该检测不是HIV-1窗口期献血的有效筛查检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验