Kawachi K, Kitamura S, Hasegawa J, Kawata T, Kobayashi S, Mizuguchi K, Nishioka H, Taniguchi S, Kameda Y, Yoshida Y
Department of Surgery III, Nara Medical College, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997 Oct;38(5):501-5.
The operative mortality and morbidity in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain high. The low ejection fraction is the major risk factor for operative mortality. However, ejection fraction (EF) alone may not necessarily be an accurate predictor of operative mortality. We studied the correlation between indices of left ventricular volume and operative mortality. One thousand patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass operations were divided into three groups according to their preoperative ejection fraction. Fifty patients (group I) had severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF < or = 0.3), 56 patients (group II) had moderately left ventricular dysfunction (0.3 < EF < or = 0.4) and 894 patients (group III) had good left ventricular function (EF > 0.4). We analyzed the relationship between hospital mortality and left ventricular volume in 106 patients with an EF < or = 0.4.
Cardiac index was not significantly different among the three groups. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and mean pulmonary artery pressure in groups I an II were higher than those in group III. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 146 +/- 44 ml/m2 in Group I, 112 +/- 31 ml/m2 in Group II and 82 + 30 ml/m2 in Group III, respectively (Group I versus II, p < 0.05, Group I and II versus III, p < 0.01). The left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) was 111 +/- 38 ml/m2 in Group I, 72 +/- 21 ml/m2 in Group II and 30 +/- 14 ml/m2 in Group III, respectively (Group I versus II, p < 0.05, Group I and II versus III, p < 0.01). The LVEDV and LVESV were higher in Group I than in Group II and both in Groups I and II were higher than in Group III. The hospital mortality of any cause before discharge was 8.0% (4/50) in Group I, 3.6% (2/56) in Group II, and 2.0% (18/894) in Group III. The mortality in Group I was higher than that in Group III, but the mortality between Groups I and II was not different. We assessed correlations between large left ventricle with left ventricular dysfunction and operative mortality in 106 patients with ejection fractions of < or = 0.4. The hospital mortality in patients with both under fraction 0.4 and an LVESV > or = 140 ml/m2 was 50% (4/8). This rate was higher than in patients with an LVESV between 80 and 140 ml/m2 (1.8%, 1/55) (p = 0.0006) and an LVESV less than 80 ml/m2 (2.3%, 1/43), (p = 0.0013). The hospital mortality in patients with an LVEDV > or = 200 ml/m2 was 67% (4/6). It was also higher than that in patients with an LVEDV between 200 and 120 ml/m2 (1.7%, 1/58), (p = 0.0001), and an LVEDV less than 120 ml/m2 (2.4%, 1/42), (p = 0.0004). We conclude that patients with a low ejection fraction and an elevated LVESV or LVEDV are at increased risk for hospital death following CABG.
接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的严重左心室功能不全患者的手术死亡率和发病率仍然很高。低射血分数是手术死亡率的主要危险因素。然而,仅射血分数(EF)不一定是手术死亡率的准确预测指标。我们研究了左心室容积指标与手术死亡率之间的相关性。1000例接受单纯冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者根据术前射血分数分为三组。50例患者(I组)有严重左心室功能不全(EF≤0.3),56例患者(II组)有中度左心室功能不全(0.3<EF≤0.4),894例患者(III组)有良好的左心室功能(EF>0.4)。我们分析了106例EF≤0.4患者的医院死亡率与左心室容积之间的关系。
三组之间的心指数无显著差异。I组和II组的左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)和平均肺动脉压高于III组。I组的左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)为146±44ml/m²,II组为112±31ml/m²,III组为82 + 30ml/m²(I组与II组比较,p<0.05,I组和II组与III组比较,p<0.01)。I组的左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)为111±38ml/m²,II组为72±21ml/m²,III组为30±14ml/m²(I组与II组比较,p<0.05,I组和II组与III组比较,p<0.01)。I组的LVEDV和LVESV高于II组,I组和II组均高于III组。I组出院前任何原因的医院死亡率为8.0%(4/50),II组为3.6%(2/56),III组为2.0%(18/894)。I组的死亡率高于III组,但I组和II组之间的死亡率无差异。我们评估了106例射血分数≤0.4的患者中左心室扩大合并左心室功能不全与手术死亡率之间的相关性。射血分数<0.4且LVESV≥140ml/m²的患者的医院死亡率为50%(4/8)。该比率高于LVESV在80至140ml/m²之间的患者(1.8%,1/55)(p = 0.0006)和LVESV小于80ml/m²的患者(2.3%,1/43)(p = 0.0013)。LVEDV≥200ml/m²的患者的医院死亡率为67%(4/6)。它也高于LVEDV在200至120ml/m²之间的患者(1.7%,1/58)(p = 0.0001)和LVEDV小于120ml/m²的患者(2.4%,1/42)(p = 0.0004)。我们得出结论,射血分数低且LVESV或LVEDV升高的患者在CABG后医院死亡风险增加。