Eager C A
Wound Care Protocols, Inc., McMinnville, Ore., USA.
Adv Wound Care. 1997 Sep;10(5):54-7.
To determine the type and quality of documentation in home health care agencies in the United States, a 15-question survey was sent to 500 agencies. The returned surveys revealed the following: (1) narrative notes were the most consistently used documentation tool; (2) 74% of agencies take photographs of the wound as part of their documentation; (3) 87% of agencies stage pressure ulcers according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) staging system; (4) 7% use reverse staging to document improvement in wounds; (5) 32% use standard protocols to treat different types of wounds; (6) 96% to 98% monitored healing by measuring length times width, as well as drainage and wound bed changes. The results indicate that most home health care agencies use the NPUAP staging system but do not track healing in a consistent way. They do not follow a consistent documentation standard, nor do their wound assessments bring together all the monitored factors indicative of healing progress.
为确定美国居家医疗保健机构中文件记录的类型和质量,向500家机构发送了一份包含15个问题的调查问卷。回收的调查问卷显示如下情况:(1)叙事性记录是最常使用的文件记录工具;(2)74%的机构将伤口照片作为其文件记录的一部分;(3)87%的机构根据国家压疮咨询小组(NPUAP)的分期系统对压疮进行分期;(4)7%使用逆向分期来记录伤口的改善情况;(5)32%使用标准方案治疗不同类型的伤口;(6)96%至98%通过测量长乘宽以及引流和伤口床变化来监测愈合情况。结果表明,大多数居家医疗保健机构使用NPUAP分期系统,但没有以一致的方式跟踪愈合情况。它们没有遵循一致的文件记录标准,其伤口评估也没有将所有表明愈合进展的监测因素整合在一起。